June Mailbag: Your F1 Comments and Questions

Spanners is joined by Danish TV journo Kristian ‘Chaos’ Pedersen and Presenter/Commentator and 7News Sports Reporter  Jonathan ‘Jono’ Simon as they mangle all the missives from the Missed Apex Mailbag. From savvy switcheroos to representative rhetoric, from au revoir opportunities to battle for the bests,  no pass on the finish line for points goes unbroadcast in this, the latest episode of Missed Apex Podcast. 

Please consider supporting us on patreon. We exist only because of our patron support:

Missed Apex F1 is creating Podcasts

Or use our Tip Jar to support our 2023  advertising campaign and help us grow the podcast 

Send us your mailbag questions at feedback@missedapex.net

Spanners Ready Spanners���� (@SpannersReady)

spanners@missedapex.net

Matt Trumpets mattpt55 (@mattpt55)

matt@missedapex.net

Matt Trumpets (@mattpt55@mastodon.social)

Chris Stevens Chris Stevens 🏁 (@ChrisOnRacing) / Twitter

Chris Stevens (@chrisonracing) • Instagram photos and videos

Chris Stevens (@chrisonracing) TikTok | Watch Chris Stevens's Newest TikTok Videos

Kristian Pedersen krede (@ikrede) / Twitter

Jonathan Simon Jonathan Simon (@jonnyess8) / Twitter

Jonathan Simon (@jonnyess8) • Instagram photos and videos

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

**Navigating the Missed Apex Mailbag: A Journey Through F1 Insights and Controversies**

1. **The Essence of Missed Apex Podcast:**
- The podcast offers a unique blend of F1 commentary, analysis, and humor, capturing the essence of the sport.
- It provides a platform for listeners to engage with the hosts and share their thoughts on F1.

2. **Positive Feedback and Supportive Community:**
- The podcast receives numerous positive feedback emails, highlighting its impact on listeners' lives.
- The hosts express gratitude for the supportive community of listeners who appreciate their approach to F1 commentary.

3. **Emotional Connection Through Motorsport:**
- Motorsport, particularly F1, evokes strong emotions and bonds people together.
- The podcast aims to capture these emotions and share them with its audience, creating a sense of community.

4. **The Importance of Independent Commentary:**
- The hosts emphasize the value of independent F1 commentary, free from commercial or team influences.
- They strive to provide balanced and informed perspectives, catering to a wide range of listeners.

5. **Monaco Grand Prix: A Love-Hate Relationship:**
- Jono Simon reflects on his experience hosting the Monaco Grand Prix episode, acknowledging its unique charm.
- Christian Pedersen expresses his dislike for Monaco's predictability, suggesting that its appeal lies in the occasional rain-induced excitement.

6. **The Beauty of Motorsport's History:**
- The hosts discuss the emotional impact of F1's rich history, particularly the tragic events surrounding Ronnie Peterson's death.
- They acknowledge the role of motorsport in shaping their passion for the sport.

7. **The Value of Fan Engagement:**
- The hosts encourage listeners to reach out and share their thoughts on the podcast, whether it's positive feedback or constructive criticism.
- They emphasize the importance of fan engagement in shaping the podcast's content and direction.

8. **The Art of Teaming Up Great Drivers:**
- The hosts debate the potential impact of pairing Sergio Perez with Kamui Kobayashi at Sauber, highlighting their ability to extract the most out of a midfield car.
- They discuss the significance of driver pairings and how they can elevate a team's performance.

9. **Exploring the True Order of the Grid:**
- A listener poses a hypothetical scenario, asking which two drivers should be swapped to reveal the true pecking order of the grid.
- The hosts engage in a lively discussion, considering various driver combinations and their potential impact on team dynamics and performance.

10. **The Challenge of Evaluating Drivers:**
- The hosts acknowledge the difficulty in accurately assessing drivers' abilities, given the complex interplay of factors such as car performance, team dynamics, and individual talent.
- They emphasize the need for careful analysis and consideration of all relevant factors to form informed opinions about drivers' true potential.

11. **The S-Class, Five-Star, and Four-and-a-Half-Star Drivers:**
- The hosts introduce a classification system to categorize drivers based on their perceived talent and achievements.
- They discuss the criteria for each category, including factors such as race pace, consistency, and the ability to win championships.

12. **The Impact of Team Dynamics on Driver Performance:**
- The hosts highlight the importance of team dynamics in shaping driver performance, noting that a harmonious and supportive environment can unlock a driver's full potential.
- They discuss the challenges drivers face when joining new teams and the time it takes to adapt and establish a strong working relationship with their teammates.

13. **The Mercedes Driver Dilemma:**
- The hosts analyze the current situation at Mercedes, where George Russell is struggling to match Lewis Hamilton's pace and results.
- They consider the various factors that may be contributing to Russell's difficulties, including the team's focus on developing the car to suit Hamilton's driving style.

14. **The Influence of Car Design on Driver Performance:**
- The hosts emphasize the significant impact that car design can have on a driver's performance.
- They discuss the importance of finding a car that suits a driver's strengths and allows them to extract the maximum potential from it.

15. **The Ferrari Driver Conundrum:**
- The hosts speculate on the potential performance of different drivers in the Ferrari car, particularly in light of the team's struggles in recent seasons.
- They consider the strengths and weaknesses of drivers like Max Verstappen, Lando Norris, and Sebastian Vettel, and how they might fare in the Ferrari. Sure, here is a detailed summary of the podcast episode transcript on Missed Apex Podcast:

**Introduction:**

* The podcast begins with a discussion about the Missed Apex Mailbag and how the hosts, Spanners, Jonathan Simon (Jono), and Kristian Pedersen (Chaos), will address listener questions.
* They encourage listeners to send in their questions via email or social media.

**Main Discussion:**

1. **Representative Tracks:**
* Michael Albon asks about the number of representative tracks on the F1 calendar.
* The hosts discuss the concept of representative tracks, which are circuits that provide a balanced test of a car's capabilities.
* They note that many modern tracks are designed to favor certain car characteristics, such as high-speed corners or overtaking opportunities, and that this can make it difficult to draw conclusions about a car's overall performance.
* They also discuss the evolution of tracks over time, and how this has affected the design of Formula One cars.

2. **Ferrari's Struggles:**
* Scott from Portland, Oregon, asks about Ferrari's prospects for the rest of the season.
* The hosts discuss Ferrari's struggles in recent races and their overall performance in the 2023 season.
* They speculate on whether Ferrari can challenge for podiums or even race wins in the second half of the season.
* They also discuss the team's long-term strategy and their hopes for the future.

3. **Cost Cap Implications for Red Bull:**
* The hosts discuss the potential impact of the cost cap penalty on Red Bull's development time and performance.
* They note that Red Bull has already turned its attention to the 2024 season, while other teams are still focused on the current year.
* They speculate on whether the cost cap penalty will affect Red Bull's dominance in the sport.

4. **Race Length and Tire Strategy:**
* Justin asks why Formula One races cannot be made longer to encourage more two to three-stop strategies.
* The hosts discuss the current two-hour time limit for races and the logistical challenges of extending races.
* They also discuss the impact of longer races on power unit durability and the overall cost of racing.
* They conclude that while longer races might provide more strategic variety, there are significant obstacles to implementing such a change.

**Conclusion:**

* The hosts wrap up the episode by thanking their listeners and encouraging them to continue sending in their questions.
* They also remind listeners about their Patreon page, where they can support the podcast and gain access to exclusive content.

**Overall Message:**

The overall message of the podcast episode is that Formula One is a complex sport with many factors that influence the performance of teams and drivers. There are no easy answers to the questions that fans have, and the hosts provide thoughtful and nuanced discussions of the various topics that are raised. * **Introduction:**

* The podcast episode features Spanners, Danish TV journalist Kristian 'Chaos' Pedersen, and Presenter/Commentator and 7News Sports Reporter Jonathan 'Jono' Simon.
* They discuss various listener questions and engage in insightful conversations about Formula One.

* **Key Points:**

* **Endurance Racing vs. Formula One:**
* Kristian Pedersen highlights the friendly rivalry between endurance racing and Formula One fans.
* He emphasizes that endurance racing fans often criticize the shorter duration of Formula One races compared to the 24-hour endurance races.
* Spanners suggests an idea of organizing a 24-hour kart race after the season, involving all drivers and teams, as a celebratory event.

* **Talent Development in Formula One:**
* Joshua, a listener, expresses his concern about the lack of new talent emerging in Formula One.
* The hosts discuss the generational gap between the current top drivers and the younger drivers.
* They acknowledge that the dominance of experienced drivers like Hamilton, Verstappen, and Vettel has limited opportunities for younger talents.
* The hosts emphasize the importance of creating a second-tier Formula One series to provide more opportunities for young drivers to showcase their skills.

* **Lance Stroll's Performance:**
* Ryan, a listener, questions whether Lance Stroll's position in the standings is justified given his performance.
* Jono Simon believes that Stroll has not performed as well as expected this season due to early-season injuries and testing issues.
* He suggests that Stroll deserves more time to prove himself, considering the significant investment made by his father, Lawrence Stroll, in Aston Martin.
* The hosts agree that nepotism may play a role in Stroll's continued presence in the team, but they also acknowledge his potential as a driver.

* **Overall Message:**

* The podcast episode delves into various aspects of Formula One, including the rivalry between endurance racing and Formula One, the challenges in developing new talent, and the ongoing debate surrounding Lance Stroll's performance.
* The hosts provide insightful perspectives and engage in thought-provoking discussions, offering a comprehensive analysis of these topics. # Missed Apex Podcast Episode Summary:

**Main Discussion:**

- The podcast begins with a discussion about the Aston Martin F1 team and its owner, Lawrence Stroll.
- The hosts debate whether Stroll's primary motivation for owning the team is to give his son, Lance Stroll, a chance to race in Formula One.
- They consider the possibility that Stroll's real motivation is to build a successful Formula One team, with Lance's participation being a secondary factor.
- The hosts also discuss Stroll's financial resources and his potential plans for the future of the team.

**Other Topics:**

- The hosts discuss the potential impact of a lighter car on the age of drivers in Formula One.
- They also discuss the upcoming Monaco Grand Prix and the possibility of Jonathan Simon hosting the event in place of Spanners.

**Key Insights:**

- The hosts acknowledge that Stroll's motivation for owning the Aston Martin F1 team is likely a combination of factors, including his desire to give his son a chance to race and his ambition to build a successful team.
- They speculate that Stroll may eventually try to buy Formula One or another major motorsport series.
- The hosts believe that a lighter car in Formula One could lead to a younger driver lineup in the future.

**Controversies:**

- There is some disagreement among the hosts about Stroll's motivations for owning the Aston Martin F1 team.
- They also debate the potential impact of a lighter car on the age of drivers in Formula One.

**Overall Message:**

- The podcast provides an insightful discussion about the Aston Martin F1 team, its owner Lawrence Stroll, and the future of Formula One.

[00:00.000 -> 00:03.800] Looking for a fun way to win up to 25 times your money this football season?
[00:03.800 -> 00:09.000] Test your skills on Prize Picks, the most exciting way to play daily fantasy sports.
[00:09.000 -> 00:15.600] Just select two or more players, pick more or less on their projection for a wide variety of statistics, and place your entry.
[00:15.600 -> 00:25.680] It's as easy as that. If you have the skills, you can turn $10 into $250 with just a few taps. Easy gameplay, quick withdrawals,
[00:25.680 -> 00:28.480] and an enormous selection of players and stat options
[00:28.480 -> 00:30.680] are what make PrizePix the number one
[00:30.680 -> 00:32.480] daily fantasy sports app.
[00:32.480 -> 00:33.960] Ready to test your skills?
[00:33.960 -> 00:36.040] Join the PrizePix community of more than
[00:36.040 -> 00:39.400] seven million football fans who have already signed up.
[00:39.400 -> 00:42.400] Right now, PrizePix will match your first deposit
[00:42.400 -> 00:44.320] up to $100.
[00:44.320 -> 00:49.400] Just visit prizepix.com slash get100 and use code get100.
[00:49.400 -> 00:53.800] That's code get100 at prizepix.com slash get100
[00:53.800 -> 00:56.920] for a first deposit match up to $100.
[00:56.920 -> 01:00.040] PrizePix, daily fantasy sports made easy.
[01:02.960 -> 01:10.640] You are listening to Miss apex podcast we live f1
[01:19.680 -> 01:25.520] welcome to miss apex podcast I'm your host Richard Ready, but my friends call me Spanners.
[01:25.520 -> 01:32.640] So let's be friends. It's a June mailbag. So if today's episode is rubbish, it's generally your
[01:32.640 -> 01:36.880] fault. We're going to get straight into the mailbag today. But before I bring in my expert
[01:36.880 -> 01:43.680] panel, I just want to read a couple of emails that were a little bit personal and stuck out to me. So
[01:43.680 -> 01:46.000] Charles has messaged to say,
[01:46.000 -> 01:47.080] just a quick note,
[01:47.080 -> 01:49.600] your podcast really is something special.
[01:49.600 -> 01:52.700] I'm not sure if you get positive feedback emails
[01:52.700 -> 01:56.760] or just a steady stream of suggestions and complaints,
[01:56.760 -> 01:58.160] but I'm sure there are many like me
[01:58.160 -> 02:00.400] who appreciate sensible, balanced,
[02:00.400 -> 02:01.960] I've never been accused of that before,
[02:01.960 -> 02:05.400] informed and fun independent F1 commentary from your shows.
[02:05.400 -> 02:06.400] You've got something special.
[02:06.400 -> 02:10.380] I hope things are going well and the podcast community is fantastic.
[02:10.380 -> 02:11.380] Thank you from Charles.
[02:11.380 -> 02:17.480] So I just want to say, if you do want to get in touch for something that isn't a question,
[02:17.480 -> 02:22.360] you just want to tell me how Missed Apex podcast fits into your world or what it means to you
[02:22.360 -> 02:29.640] or where you listen to it, I always make the time to try and listen to those things. And yes, we do get a steady
[02:29.640 -> 02:34.120] stream of suggestions slash complaints, but it is massively, massively
[02:34.120 -> 02:38.380] overwhelmed by the amount of you that are supportive of what we've been doing
[02:38.380 -> 02:44.040] and have been doing so since about 2016. So no, never feel bad about
[02:44.040 -> 02:46.800] just emailing for no reason. Get in touch. I always make
[02:46.800 -> 02:52.880] time to read those DMs and read those emails. And then we've got a very random thank you
[02:52.880 -> 03:00.240] to all of you on our podcast from Sealy. On the 1st of February, my dad died. And the following
[03:00.240 -> 03:05.400] day, all I could do was listen to Missed Apex. My dad introduced me to F1, me
[03:05.400 -> 03:10.760] too. When I was about five years old, me too. He tried MotoGP, but F1 won. And then for
[03:10.760 -> 03:16.000] the following 33 years, it has been one thing that we could always talk about. Bondover.
[03:16.000 -> 03:20.440] And I was listening to one of your magazine shows the day after he died, and it was extremely
[03:20.440 -> 03:25.440] soothing to me. And it reminded me of the many conversations we've had, particularly of
[03:25.440 -> 03:31.640] the 1999 European Grand Prix. It was mentioned as an all-time classic and hands down I cannot
[03:31.640 -> 03:36.800] remember another race like it. Back in the 90s and the 2000s I only got to listen to
[03:36.800 -> 03:42.760] races live on the radio and my dad would record them off the telly on VHS. That race, following
[03:42.760 -> 03:45.040] the action on the radio and then watching it on later,
[03:45.040 -> 03:50.160] with my notebook by my side. It was great memories. Thank you very much from Cecil.
[03:50.160 -> 03:55.520] And like I say, we love hearing stuff like that. Please do tell me how you listen to the show,
[03:55.520 -> 04:00.000] where it slots into your routine. I absolutely love that. Just message me,
[04:00.000 -> 04:05.360] talk to me. I promise you it is one of the best parts of doing Mr Apex podcast.
[04:05.360 -> 04:09.520] Because we're an independent podcast produced in the podcasting shed with the kind permission
[04:09.520 -> 04:13.840] of our better halves. We aim to bring you a race review before your Monday morning commute.
[04:13.840 -> 04:16.080] We might be wrong, but we're first.
[04:20.880 -> 04:26.000] I'm joined in the shed by our Monaco super sub host Jonathan Simon. Thank you
[04:26.000 -> 04:30.520] Jono for taking over for the Monaco Grand Prix. It was fun I know you're not
[04:30.520 -> 04:34.040] the biggest fan of Monaco, surely after this year you come back for next one?
[04:34.040 -> 04:38.440] See the thing is every time you build up enough credit of saying the
[04:38.440 -> 04:42.520] Monaco Grand Prix is like oddly uneventful and it should definitely be
[04:42.520 -> 04:48.800] dropped, you'll get the odd one that comes along that has a vague amount of interest, and it's always a little bit rain-related.
[04:48.800 -> 04:53.680] And no matter how much you caveat, Monaco is definitely pointless unless there's that
[04:53.680 -> 04:56.180] exactly correct amount of rain.
[04:56.180 -> 04:58.960] Every time the rain comes, people go, see!
[04:58.960 -> 05:02.160] That completely justifies the last five years of garbage!
[05:02.160 -> 05:03.160] No, it doesn't.
[05:03.160 -> 05:04.160] No, it does not.
[05:04.160 -> 05:08.240] No, it doesn't. And you know what, I'll tell you this, that's Law of Averages for you, the next one is gonna
[05:08.240 -> 05:09.240] be good.
[05:09.240 -> 05:12.320] If you have ten bad races, surely the next one's gonna be an entertaining one.
[05:12.320 -> 05:13.320] And you missed it!
[05:13.320 -> 05:15.080] No, if, from now on, I don't mind.
[05:15.080 -> 05:19.160] I was happy that if I got you to sub in, at least there was some interest for that one.
[05:19.160 -> 05:21.200] But from now on, Monaco Grand Prix, that's yours.
[05:21.200 -> 05:25.680] I'm also joined in the shed by our mad Viking, Christian Pedersen.
[05:25.680 -> 05:26.680] Hey, Capehead.
[05:26.680 -> 05:31.920] Good evening, my friends. Why is Matt never here when I'm here?
[05:31.920 -> 05:34.480] He doesn't like you, just at all. Like, just straight up.
[05:34.480 -> 05:38.760] You know, I sensed it, but confirmed? Okay.
[05:38.760 -> 05:44.320] Yeah, he says he once took a trip to the Little Mermaid. It took 45 minutes walk and a boat
[05:44.320 -> 05:45.200] and it was rubbish.
[05:45.200 -> 05:46.640] And that's why he doesn't like you.
[05:46.640 -> 05:48.920] I'm just going to say on behalf of the Danish population,
[05:48.920 -> 05:50.760] I'm just, I'm sorry, Matt.
[05:50.760 -> 05:52.320] I hope we can forget it.
[05:52.320 -> 05:54.600] Do a podcast in the future together.
[05:54.600 -> 05:56.480] No, Matt has a gig.
[05:56.480 -> 05:59.000] He has a job, you know, blowing through a trumpet.
[05:59.000 -> 06:02.560] But hey, Christian, you were great on the last show we did,
[06:02.560 -> 06:07.480] you know, reflecting on olden days times and when you you get an email like like
[06:07.920 -> 06:13.280] Sally's one and which by the way you know obviously as a mailbag show or we would dive straight into the mailbag
[06:13.720 -> 06:19.180] When you get an email like that it kind of reminds us why we all love motorsports so much you know
[06:19.180 -> 06:23.680] And this is why actually I take it a little bit personally when people come into the f1 podcast space
[06:23.680 -> 06:28.260] And then just dump on f1, like little brats.
[06:28.260 -> 06:30.760] But the passion around motorsport,
[06:30.760 -> 06:33.180] what it invokes in you, the way it bonds people,
[06:33.180 -> 06:35.040] is something really special.
[06:35.040 -> 06:38.280] I had a similar bond with my father over motorsport.
[06:38.280 -> 06:40.120] For me, it was my mother, actually.
[06:41.160 -> 06:44.680] I don't know why, she was just always into fast, noisy cars.
[06:44.680 -> 06:45.440] And whenever they were on the TV, she was just always into fast, noisy cars.
[06:45.440 -> 06:48.960] Whenever they were on the TV, she was like, look, look, look, cars, go around.
[06:48.960 -> 06:49.960] I don't care.
[06:49.960 -> 06:52.120] I want to windsurf, whatever.
[06:52.120 -> 06:58.200] It never really did anything for me, but when I grew up and realized it, it was thanks to
[06:58.200 -> 06:59.200] her.
[06:59.200 -> 07:03.600] I watched Ronnie Peterson, not a good day, but the day he lost his life, I think it was
[07:03.600 -> 07:07.440] at Munster on my brother's birthday.
[07:07.440 -> 07:12.600] That is the first Formula One memory I have, which is because my mom forced us all to watch
[07:12.600 -> 07:15.160] it on his birthday and that was a kill.
[07:15.160 -> 07:17.640] Not good, but that's racing.
[07:17.640 -> 07:20.400] It's good to know that your first Formula One memories of...
[07:20.400 -> 07:24.720] Ronnie, that was a sad memory, but he was one of the greatest drivers ever to pilot
[07:24.720 -> 07:25.920] a Formula One car.
[07:25.920 -> 07:30.640] My first memory was Austria 2002, and that wasn't a very good memory because Ferrari
[07:30.640 -> 07:34.960] switched the cars at the finish line and did all that little schmozzle.
[07:34.960 -> 07:39.640] But I will add to the mailbag question we did get in, or not really a question, but
[07:39.640 -> 07:44.480] sort of a nice statement and story, which was people don't appreciate what it was like
[07:44.480 -> 07:46.320] to watch F1, especially in the 90s.
[07:46.320 -> 07:51.360] And I remember hearing stories about people in the 50s and 60s who would find out Jim
[07:51.360 -> 07:56.880] Clark passed away a month later through newspapers because it was so hard to access information
[07:56.880 -> 07:57.880] back then.
[07:57.880 -> 07:58.880] Yeah.
[07:58.880 -> 08:02.900] And, Amy, you're making me think of what are my first memories, but you first, Christian.
[08:02.900 -> 08:05.640] The entire event back in the days was the thing, right?
[08:05.640 -> 08:09.720] You went there with people, it was like a holiday.
[08:09.720 -> 08:13.180] It still is for some people, but nowadays a lot of people
[08:13.180 -> 08:16.860] just can't get the same amount of information elsewhere.
[08:16.860 -> 08:20.200] Back then it was a different matter basically.
[08:20.200 -> 08:23.500] You camp there and it's a bit of the Le Mans feeling
[08:23.500 -> 08:25.040] at the Formula One races, actually.
[08:25.040 -> 08:29.200] Ah, you see, I never went to a Formula One race until 2013.
[08:29.200 -> 08:32.320] That's the first time I was able to get to a Grand Prix.
[08:32.320 -> 08:38.240] And so for me, you know, little tiny violins, but economically getting to Silverstone was difficult,
[08:38.240 -> 08:43.200] even back in the olden days, and a foreign Grand Prix just absolutely was never on.
[08:43.200 -> 08:46.000] If they'd have got a Copenhagen Grand Prix in there somewhere,
[08:46.000 -> 08:48.000] I might have been able to sneak in.
[08:48.000 -> 08:50.000] They did actually have one.
[08:50.000 -> 08:51.000] Did they? No.
[08:51.000 -> 08:52.000] No, in Roskilde.
[08:52.000 -> 08:54.000] Oh, that's in the south.
[08:54.000 -> 08:57.000] No, it's in the suburbs of Copenhagen.
[08:57.000 -> 08:59.000] Oh, okay. So when did they manage that?
[08:59.000 -> 09:01.000] I think it was in the 70s or something.
[09:01.000 -> 09:03.000] It wasn't an actual Formula One race.
[09:03.000 -> 09:08.560] I think it was just like a circle or something. But it was called the Formula One race. Or maybe that was just a
[09:08.560 -> 09:12.060] Formula One car. Never mind. It's somewhere on Wikipedia.
[09:12.060 -> 09:16.080] But for me, Formula One was always a TV sport growing up. So I've always known it as a TV
[09:16.080 -> 09:21.160] sport, but that didn't dull the passion for it at all. And I do briefly remember, I have
[09:21.160 -> 09:27.460] a real memory of being in a playground that means I must have been about six or seven, otherwise I wouldn't be in that playground, and telling
[09:27.460 -> 09:30.060] people I was a Riccardo Patrese fan.
[09:30.060 -> 09:32.900] And I have no idea why I'm a Riccardo Patrese fan.
[09:32.900 -> 09:35.400] I think he drove for Williams.
[09:35.400 -> 09:37.500] That might be why I've always been a Williams fan.
[09:37.500 -> 09:41.980] But actually, one of my earliest memories that I can really remember is Nigel Mansell
[09:41.980 -> 09:45.740] blowing that win by either knocking his fuel pump off or whatever he did?
[09:45.740 -> 09:46.240] Jono?
[09:46.240 -> 09:51.600] I was gonna say, were you just saying the Ricardo Patrice thing to zig when everyone zags?
[09:51.600 -> 09:52.100] Maybe.
[09:52.100 -> 09:54.440] Because maybe he doesn't... you were his only fan back then.
[09:54.440 -> 09:59.200] So maybe I was just being like, alternative, like, yeah, I'm not... I don't even wear jeans.
[09:59.200 -> 10:04.400] We don't even have a TV in my house. Yeah, I'm a Ricardo Patrice fan for some reason,
[10:04.400 -> 10:09.800] while everyone correctly was like into Nigel Mansell, Alan Prost and Ayrton Senna.
[10:09.800 -> 10:14.160] Which I will add back then, now I know I wasn't alive during the early 90s, but wasn't it
[10:14.160 -> 10:16.920] like being a Sergio Perez fan, which you kind of are now?
[10:16.920 -> 10:21.080] I'm not being a Sergio Perez fan just to be difficult. I've genuinely been supporting
[10:21.080 -> 10:25.600] him all through his journey. And actually one of my favorite times in Formula 1,
[10:25.600 -> 10:28.800] watching Perez, was when he was teamed up with Kobayashi
[10:28.800 -> 10:30.200] at Sauber.
[10:30.200 -> 10:33.500] And I genuinely thought here were two talented drivers
[10:33.500 -> 10:35.300] in a midfield team, you know, pushing.
[10:35.300 -> 10:37.000] And it's almost kind of that Haas vibe,
[10:37.000 -> 10:38.800] where you had Magnussen and Grosjean,
[10:38.800 -> 10:40.200] where you went, these two guys,
[10:40.200 -> 10:41.700] they could push this team forward.
[10:41.700 -> 10:44.200] This team could go and nick a result.
[10:44.200 -> 10:48.960] Remember the battle in Malaysia, Perez, and was it Alonso in the Ferrari?
[10:48.960 -> 10:49.760] Alonso.
[10:49.760 -> 10:50.160] Yeah.
[10:50.160 -> 10:51.280] That was amazing.
[10:51.280 -> 10:54.880] And they were up there a lot because both of those guys were managing their tyres
[10:54.880 -> 10:58.080] really well. And it was Sauber, wasn't it? I'm not imagining it. I think they were Sauber.
[10:58.080 -> 10:58.880] It was Sauber, yeah.
[10:58.880 -> 11:02.880] And they definitely had even like a front row lockout at one point as well. And it might have
[11:02.880 -> 11:06.040] been a Hungarian, I'm going to guess, I'm going to say Hungarian Grand Prix, and I hope that no one point as well. And it might've been a, I'm gonna guess, I'm gonna say Hungarian Grand Prix
[11:06.040 -> 11:07.760] and I hope that no one looks it up.
[11:07.760 -> 11:08.600] I can't remember.
[11:08.600 -> 11:11.560] Yeah, but they were genuinely like a pairing
[11:11.560 -> 11:16.080] of drivers that were, again, not the top, top level drivers,
[11:16.080 -> 11:18.360] but just had something and on their day,
[11:18.360 -> 11:21.040] they could produce a strategy, they could drive forward,
[11:21.040 -> 11:23.360] pull that qualifying out of the bag,
[11:23.360 -> 11:25.960] make an alternate strategy work.
[11:25.960 -> 11:30.760] So no, I'm not just supporting Sergio Perez to be difficult. How dare you, Jono? How dare
[11:30.760 -> 11:31.760] you?
[11:31.760 -> 11:32.760] No, I said different, not difficult.
[11:32.760 -> 11:34.760] I know, I saw it in your eyes.
[11:34.760 -> 11:36.640] I saw it in your eyes.
[11:36.640 -> 11:39.200] The connection didn't come across right.
[11:39.200 -> 11:46.480] Why don't we get into our mailbag? We've got a lot of great questions here today. So this one is from Chris
[11:47.120 -> 11:52.800] in Maryland. It's a good question. If you could magically restart the season and swap any two
[11:52.800 -> 11:58.640] drivers, knowing how things have played out so far, who are you swapping? And this is great,
[11:58.640 -> 12:05.440] to learn the most about the true order of the grid. This is such a good question. So if you can swap
[12:05.440 -> 12:10.800] two drivers so that you can make a relative comparison to learn more about the true order
[12:10.800 -> 12:15.920] of the grid. And that is, by the way, low key, one of the funnest things about F1,
[12:15.920 -> 12:21.280] teasing apart who really are the great drivers, who's doing what with what machinery, who's
[12:21.280 -> 12:27.400] overdriving the car, who's underdriving the car, Who's getting 110% impossibly out of a car?
[12:27.400 -> 12:38.200] Let's see, Chris continues and says, I think the answer for him is either Perez or Stroll for one of the Alpines, maybe Norris, Albon or Sonoda.
[12:38.200 -> 12:44.200] Personally, I would swap Stroll and Norris. If Lando is the real deal, he should be at least Alonso's equal.
[12:44.200 -> 12:48.200] And if Lance couldn't best a rookie, he shouldn't be on the grid.
[12:48.200 -> 12:51.600] Love the podcast. Chris in Maryland, USA.
[12:51.600 -> 12:54.100] Hello, America. A listener from America, guys.
[12:54.100 -> 12:55.400] This is great. Jono.
[12:55.400 -> 12:56.800] It's a good question.
[12:56.800 -> 13:02.100] The premise is fantastic, because teasing out the real order of these 20 drivers
[13:02.100 -> 13:05.600] is one of the funnest things I like to think about.
[13:05.600 -> 13:09.160] So we're talking about drivers here and not actual cars or teams?
[13:09.160 -> 13:10.160] No, no.
[13:10.160 -> 13:16.240] So what you can do is you can basically put Piastri up against Sargent in a Williams to
[13:16.240 -> 13:17.960] see who's the best driver.
[13:17.960 -> 13:19.800] You can swap that around.
[13:19.800 -> 13:20.800] I would love to.
[13:20.800 -> 13:25.040] I mean, obviously, the number one is putting Hamilton in Verstapp, you know, Hamilton and Verstappen or Alonso and
[13:25.040 -> 13:27.400] Verstappen or Alonso and Hamilton again, or something
[13:27.400 -> 13:29.560] like that. That would be the funnest one. But I do think
[13:29.560 -> 13:33.880] putting a top, what I call five star drivers, five star to me is
[13:33.880 -> 13:36.280] a driver with world championship talent who earns it, you know
[13:36.280 -> 13:38.480] what I mean? They don't get lucky. No offence, Jenson
[13:38.480 -> 13:41.200] Button, tremendous driver, but that was a very good car in
[13:41.200 -> 13:43.200] 2009. I think Jenson's-
[13:43.280 -> 13:47.040] Jenson Button was a good enough driver that if those opportunities come along, he would
[13:47.040 -> 13:48.040] take it.
[13:48.040 -> 13:51.520] You know, and there have been less good drivers...
[13:51.520 -> 13:55.360] I don't want to do this because I was such a big Damon Hill fan, but if you look at like
[13:55.360 -> 14:00.640] Damon Hill in a rocket ship, in exactly the right time, you know, he was relatively lucky
[14:00.640 -> 14:03.040] getting into that position with the team.
[14:03.040 -> 14:10.520] And then, you know, and then he picked up that title. Button's title isn't that. He played the career game well enough, was significantly
[14:10.520 -> 14:15.120] better than Rubens Barrichello, so whilst your point stands, I'm not gonna go out and
[14:15.120 -> 14:20.520] out and go, well, Button just fluked a title. He had a good enough career to pick up a title.
[14:20.520 -> 14:25.200] Well, we'll leave that at that. Like Rosberg. But I do like Jensen, so I won't.
[14:25.200 -> 14:26.200] Like Rosberg.
[14:26.200 -> 14:27.200] Rosberg is the same.
[14:27.200 -> 14:28.200] Like Rosberg.
[14:28.200 -> 14:29.200] Exactly.
[14:29.200 -> 14:30.760] Four and a half star drivers, which is what I'm trying to say.
[14:30.760 -> 14:31.760] I'll take that.
[14:31.760 -> 14:35.180] Now, the reason I'm getting into this is I would like to see a five star driver in that
[14:35.180 -> 14:38.080] Alpine and actually find out how good that Alpine is.
[14:38.080 -> 14:40.280] Now, is the Alpine a top four car?
[14:40.280 -> 14:44.040] It was very quick at Monaco, and that's the only round it's been quick this season.
[14:44.040 -> 14:49.520] That's what I would want to know. But if you're talking about driver pairings, yes, I would love to put Lando in one of the
[14:49.520 -> 14:51.440] top three cars, not the Ferraris.
[14:51.440 -> 14:52.880] I'm talking about the other top three teams.
[14:52.880 -> 14:56.480] Yes, Ferrari is the fourth quickest car this year, everybody, just letting you know that.
[14:56.480 -> 15:00.480] And I would love to see if Lando Norris is the real deal, because to him, I think Norris
[15:00.480 -> 15:02.960] is a four and a half star driver and I would like to be proved wrong.
[15:02.960 -> 15:03.520] Ooh, okay.
[15:03.520 -> 15:04.400] Well, that's interesting.
[15:04.400 -> 15:05.960] Christian, where do we put Norris is a four and a half star driver and I would like to be proved wrong. Okay, well, that's interesting. Christian, where do we put Norris?
[15:05.960 -> 15:12.360] Four and a half star driver, I think at the moment is a stretch because he might be, but
[15:12.360 -> 15:13.680] I don't know if we've seen that.
[15:13.680 -> 15:20.340] I think that is based entirely on thumping Ricciardo at this point, isn't it?
[15:20.340 -> 15:27.680] Could we use the scale of S-tier as like goat class?
[15:27.680 -> 15:28.800] Yeah, potential guy.
[15:28.800 -> 15:32.560] No one will ever... This is like the best of the best in the world.
[15:32.560 -> 15:33.060] Yeah.
[15:34.160 -> 15:39.440] And is Lando Norris, Max Verstappen, Hamilton, Schumacher?
[15:40.640 -> 15:46.000] I think he's very, very, very good. I think he's 4.9 maybe, but he's not a 5.
[15:46.000 -> 15:52.000] I think you guys are being not, look, I might end up being wrong. And this is exactly what Chris's question is saying.
[15:52.000 -> 15:58.000] Who do we put Lando Norris up against where he goes in there and in the second half of his first season in that team,
[15:58.000 -> 16:08.080] really takes it to them and looks like the better driver. Which team do we put Norris in to prove it one way or the other? So you could be really kind of harsh and go in at Red Bull where you're not even, you're
[16:08.080 -> 16:11.960] not going to get the number one equal status car.
[16:11.960 -> 16:13.800] So that kind of makes it a bit interesting.
[16:13.800 -> 16:18.400] Probably the most interesting one is swap Lando Norris for Lewis Hamilton and see how
[16:18.400 -> 16:20.000] he does against George Russell.
[16:20.000 -> 16:24.960] Now if he gives George Russell a kick in on race pace, then you start to go, oh, maybe,
[16:24.960 -> 16:25.160] maybe.
[16:25.640 -> 16:27.880] That would be a very reasonable comparison,
[16:28.360 -> 16:31.040] those two together in a Mercedes, I would say.
[16:31.360 -> 16:33.600] If I could just make a point, I would,
[16:33.880 -> 16:36.920] I actually, I read the question maybe in a different way.
[16:36.960 -> 16:39.520] I read it as, who would you see in the,
[16:39.560 -> 16:43.560] who would you take from a team they're in now
[16:43.600 -> 16:46.320] and put in another team to see the greatest pairing.
[16:46.320 -> 16:53.280] Does that make sense? I mean, I want to take Juki and put him in Paris's seat.
[16:53.280 -> 16:58.480] That would be a great Red Bull for me. I would also like to put Ricciardo in that seat,
[16:58.480 -> 17:05.500] but that's a different story. I would like to see Albon in the Aston Martin next to Alonso. Yes.
[17:05.500 -> 17:11.000] And this is just for the fun of it, but for like Vesti, who's, is he leading GP2 right
[17:11.000 -> 17:12.000] now?
[17:12.000 -> 17:13.000] He's a Dane.
[17:13.000 -> 17:14.000] Oh, there we go.
[17:14.000 -> 17:15.000] Let's get him in the Mercedes.
[17:15.000 -> 17:16.000] He's a Mercedes driver.
[17:16.000 -> 17:18.880] I want to see if he can do some Formula 1 test.
[17:18.880 -> 17:23.560] Christian just dropped the, is he leading GP2, which is an accidental way of saying
[17:23.560 -> 17:27.320] that I've been watching F1 for 10 years plus and I know what GP2
[17:27.320 -> 17:29.320] Oh
[17:29.320 -> 17:35.240] Did I accidentally use the olden days terms my version of doing that is I'll accidentally say prime an option instead of
[17:37.480 -> 17:40.840] Sorry, it's just I've been watching f1 so long. Sorry to sorry
[17:40.840 -> 17:45.360] I was leaning on this gate that I'm gatekeeping on right Right. So, Jono, you were trying to come in.
[17:45.360 -> 17:48.720] JONO Well, no, all I was gonna say was, I think
[17:48.720 -> 17:54.760] if you did end up pairing somebody with George Russell, or the other way around, and that's
[17:54.760 -> 17:59.440] great that that was brought up, I think if you put George Russell in the Red Bull, now
[17:59.440 -> 18:00.760] that is very interesting.
[18:00.760 -> 18:05.080] Because we think George Russell has potential to win... okay, now Christian's
[18:05.080 -> 18:10.480] invented a good class here. S-class, five star. And then four and a half star. S-class
[18:10.480 -> 18:14.440] is your greatest of all time, five star are great enough to win a world championship.
[18:14.440 -> 18:19.640] Four and a half is, lucked into a car that was really good. Five, is I think where George
[18:19.640 -> 18:24.680] Russell stands at the moment, but he's joined that team at the worst time, could he have
[18:24.680 -> 18:25.640] gotten a better car?
[18:25.760 -> 18:27.320] He's sort of alongside Hamilton.
[18:27.320 -> 18:28.960] We're not really sure yet with George Russell.
[18:28.960 -> 18:32.320] I think he has potential to be an S-Class driver, but who knows?
[18:32.360 -> 18:35.000] I, well, I love how we're jumping around, but let's stick
[18:35.000 -> 18:36.600] with like Russell and Norris.
[18:36.840 -> 18:42.800] So, so I think George Russell is, is fair, is going to fair better than Bottas.
[18:43.200 -> 18:47.720] But we're in that sort of ballpark because with the team settled on race pace,
[18:47.720 -> 18:50.880] and look, I'd love to be corrected, I'd love to be wrong,
[18:50.880 -> 18:53.400] because as a Brit, I'll be happy to see
[18:53.400 -> 18:56.020] another Brit breaking through into S-class.
[18:56.020 -> 18:58.040] Where does S come from, like super?
[18:58.040 -> 19:00.360] Is that S for super?
[19:00.360 -> 19:01.680] I think it's from Mario Kart, isn't it?
[19:01.680 -> 19:02.680] Oh.
[19:02.680 -> 19:04.000] No, I actually don't know.
[19:04.000 -> 19:07.000] It's just, it's better than the rest. That's all I know from YouTube.
[19:07.000 -> 19:10.000] That's what I base everything on.
[19:10.000 -> 19:16.000] I would be happy to be wrong about this, but from what I'm seeing, the difference in the race pace,
[19:16.000 -> 19:21.000] looking at the lap times, it's not a great deal different to Hamilton-Botta.
[19:21.000 -> 19:25.840] Rosberg's somewhere in between in between that. So if
[19:25.840 -> 19:30.680] you drop, you know, Lando Norris in there right now, is he going to fare any better
[19:30.680 -> 19:34.200] than George Russell? That's the question. But Russell, you're right, has gone in at
[19:34.200 -> 19:39.160] a particularly bad time. So I think there's a resurgent Hamilton at the moment. There's
[19:39.160 -> 19:46.120] a team that is still sore from Abu Dhabi 2021, who still I think would be backing Hamilton and now they've
[19:46.120 -> 19:50.640] gone in his engineering direction. There was a recent news story saying that Hamilton was
[19:50.640 -> 19:54.420] pushing in August of last year to go in the direction they're going now. I think a lot
[19:54.420 -> 19:58.640] of it to do is to do with the front suspension and the driver position, because he was complaining
[19:58.640 -> 20:02.840] that his driver position was too far forward compared to the rest of the cars. So the car
[20:02.840 -> 20:05.320] that they are now putting out
[20:05.320 -> 20:09.280] onto Grand Prix and developing with is Hamilton's vision,
[20:09.280 -> 20:11.320] is a car designed for Lewis Hamilton.
[20:11.320 -> 20:13.280] So when we see the results from George Russell,
[20:13.280 -> 20:15.240] if he's looking a little bit off on race pace,
[20:15.240 -> 20:17.280] I think we do need to bear that in mind.
[20:17.280 -> 20:19.800] I think the top three teams all have a chosen
[20:19.800 -> 20:22.280] number one driver and the Mercedes mission right now
[20:22.280 -> 20:24.480] is we love you, George, you're great,
[20:24.480 -> 20:28.800] but we're pushing Lewis Hamilton forward. So we have to remember that I think when we're talking about Russell.
[20:28.800 -> 20:34.000] But Russell is at least at the hot end so we can judge him fairly to an extent of what he's doing
[20:34.000 -> 20:39.840] at the sharp end of the grid. My concern, Christian, with Lando Norris is that he has been kind of
[20:39.840 -> 20:44.640] festering towards the bottom end of the grid, really struggling, really fighting a car,
[20:45.480 -> 20:52.280] westering towards the bottom end of the grid, really struggling, really fighting a car, not, not, almost like marking time, waiting for another career opportunity, waiting for
[20:52.280 -> 20:55.760] something to happen. And in that environment, I don't think you always get the best out
[20:55.760 -> 20:56.760] of yourself.
[20:56.760 -> 21:01.960] I think it's impossible to get the best out of yourself in a new team, in a car that was
[21:01.960 -> 21:04.280] supposed to be leading, driving in the midfield.
[21:04.280 -> 21:05.280] This is Russell now, yeah.
[21:05.280 -> 21:11.240] I think it's really, really important to not underestimate how much pressure is on these
[21:11.240 -> 21:12.240] guys.
[21:12.240 -> 21:19.840] So for Russell's sake, I'm not seeing him doing badly in any sort of way.
[21:19.840 -> 21:23.840] I think he's doing brilliantly.
[21:23.840 -> 21:29.520] The crash in Canada, yeah, but I mean, this will happen and that's okay.
[21:29.520 -> 21:31.380] Last year he was outracing Hamilton.
[21:31.380 -> 21:35.240] Maybe Hamilton didn't turn it up to 11 in the car last year because of the way he drives
[21:35.240 -> 21:39.900] and stuff like that, but still he's managing it up at that level.
[21:39.900 -> 21:46.680] And I want to add, it's a bit unfair to talk about S-tier class drivers with these young guys,
[21:46.680 -> 21:52.520] I think, because you can't really be an S-tier driver when you're, well, Max Verstappen is
[21:52.520 -> 21:53.520] unique.
[21:53.520 -> 21:54.520] He's a one of a kind.
[21:54.520 -> 21:59.200] That is why we say it, but we didn't say that about Max Verstappen two years ago.
[21:59.200 -> 22:04.640] I think this is something where if Max Verstappen's career ends now, he's always going to be an
[22:04.640 -> 22:05.480] S-class
[22:05.480 -> 22:06.480] driver.
[22:06.480 -> 22:08.800] Now, would Vettel have been the same if he'd retired in 2014?
[22:08.800 -> 22:09.800] Possibly.
[22:09.800 -> 22:10.800] You never know.
[22:10.800 -> 22:14.680] Instead, now we think of Vettel as a five-star driver because of the way his second half
[22:14.680 -> 22:15.880] of his career went.
[22:15.880 -> 22:19.480] Not to steer away from the topic, but one more on that, and back to the George Russell's
[22:19.480 -> 22:24.320] thing is, look, last year, there's no question George proved that he has potential to be
[22:24.320 -> 22:27.500] one of the greatest drivers ever to hail F1.
[22:27.500 -> 22:29.000] He's got the speed for it.
[22:29.000 -> 22:34.660] But law of averages, Lewis Hamilton had a lot of bad luck last year and that sort of
[22:34.660 -> 22:38.980] helped and George always seemed to be quick when the car was good, which made his performances
[22:38.980 -> 22:42.400] look a lot better too and you would score more points and blah, blah, blah.
[22:42.400 -> 22:47.520] But this year again, we're starting to see the averages come out and George is now suffering the bad luck side of things.
[22:47.520 -> 22:49.360] So that also has a part to play.
[22:49.360 -> 22:53.120] Spanner's point is really good too, where the car is designed for Lewis's favour.
[22:53.120 -> 22:54.640] I think so. I think so.
[22:54.640 -> 22:56.080] I think so too.
[22:56.080 -> 22:59.520] And that's put a little bit of the sway in Lewis's favour.
[22:59.520 -> 23:01.680] But to the...
[23:01.680 -> 23:02.960] Oh, Christian, quickly on that,
[23:02.960 -> 23:05.800] because then I was going to say another driver we could swap.
[23:05.800 -> 23:06.800] Oh yeah, let's do that.
[23:06.800 -> 23:08.520] Let's have Christian's point and then go back to Jonno.
[23:08.520 -> 23:10.640] Just a short one.
[23:10.640 -> 23:14.720] Following the Hamilton plan doesn't necessarily mean a solution on the car.
[23:14.720 -> 23:20.200] That plan could be getting another guy in who was on sort of a vacation-ish.
[23:20.200 -> 23:21.200] I'm just saying.
[23:21.200 -> 23:22.200] Oh, James Allison.
[23:22.200 -> 23:23.200] That's true.
[23:23.200 -> 23:24.200] Yes, that's a good point.
[23:24.200 -> 23:25.840] Yeah, He could have
[23:25.840 -> 23:29.280] been going, why isn't James here? That could have been the plan. And that would be to the
[23:29.280 -> 23:34.800] benefit of George Russell as well. No, I'd look. When we're having this discussion about which
[23:34.800 -> 23:40.320] drivers to swap in, the reason why I initially wanted to avoid the top three teams is precisely
[23:40.320 -> 23:46.280] because one driver is going to win that political battle. It's more we know of it more because it's talked about more.
[23:46.360 -> 23:48.080] It might be the same all the way down the grid.
[23:48.240 -> 23:49.920] But, you know, you've got Alonso and Hamilton.
[23:50.120 -> 23:55.320] Was 2007 the greatest way to judge who's
[23:55.520 -> 23:58.680] the better driver between Alonso and Lewis Hamilton?
[23:58.880 -> 24:01.480] Probably not, because the garage splits a lot.
[24:01.680 -> 24:05.240] You get the feeling that Alonso lost the garage a little bit in the way that he's probably lost every garage and he's probably going to lose the garage splits a lot. You get the feeling that Alonso lost the garage a little bit
[24:05.240 -> 24:07.640] in the way that he's probably lost every garage,
[24:07.640 -> 24:10.560] and he's probably going to lose the garage at Aston Martin
[24:10.560 -> 24:11.320] as well.
[24:11.320 -> 24:14.160] So yeah, when you go, let's do these driver swaps,
[24:14.160 -> 24:18.200] you can't just go, right, let's smash Verstappen and Alonso
[24:18.200 -> 24:20.560] together at Ferrari and see how it goes.
[24:20.560 -> 24:22.840] So, Jono, next one.
[24:22.840 -> 24:27.160] Look, I think we've squeezed the juice out of this orange a lot
[24:27.160 -> 24:30.800] out of this question, because it's hard to find the true picking order out of just one
[24:30.800 -> 24:36.560] driver switch. But I wish this was last year, because I'd love to put somebody in a Ferrari
[24:36.560 -> 24:41.760] and find out if that car can actually win a world championship. Probably not. And we'll
[24:41.760 -> 24:47.160] have to move on. So you want to see, hang on, so you want to see if last year another driver could have
[24:47.160 -> 24:49.440] delivered a title with Ferrari?
[24:49.440 -> 24:54.480] They probably wouldn't, but I'd like to see if a Stappan in a Ferrari or a Lancia in a
[24:54.480 -> 24:56.800] Ferrari or something would have been, you know, a lot better.
[24:56.800 -> 25:01.060] That would have told me the true pecking order of how good Charles Leclerc is and how good
[25:01.060 -> 25:02.060] Carlos Sainz is.
[25:02.060 -> 25:04.960] I think that's a bit mean because I do think both those drivers are really good.
[25:04.960 -> 25:06.040] We can do that another time. and how good colour science is. I think that's a bit mean, because I do think both those drivers are really good. And the car is not up to speed.
[25:06.040 -> 25:10.000] You can do that another time. You can do championship battles and say, right, swap drivers in the
[25:10.000 -> 25:16.840] top cars, and how does it affect the title chase? So, you know, I think there are cars
[25:16.840 -> 25:22.960] that could have won championships with different drivers. And I'll immediately say 2009, another
[25:22.960 -> 25:26.160] driver in the Red Bull could have picked that title.
[25:26.160 -> 25:27.160] Oh, what?
[25:27.160 -> 25:28.160] Yeah, I'm gonna go with that.
[25:28.160 -> 25:29.160] No.
[25:29.160 -> 25:31.920] Well, that's the impression I had at the time.
[25:31.920 -> 25:35.280] Now I'd have to go back and re-watch it to justify it.
[25:35.280 -> 25:38.960] Well, my best example to that is 2018.
[25:38.960 -> 25:39.960] And this is Valtteri Bottas's...
[25:39.960 -> 25:40.960] Battle again.
[25:40.960 -> 25:41.960] Oh no, sorry, 2017, excuse me.
[25:41.960 -> 25:42.960] Yes.
[25:42.960 -> 25:47.920] Valtteri Bottas's first year in Mercedes, finished fifth in the championship, his teammate dominated,
[25:47.920 -> 25:52.440] finished first. You've talking about, you could have had a Sebastian Vettel, Max Verstappen
[25:52.440 -> 25:57.680] or Kimi Räikkönen World Championship in a Ferrari over Valtteri Bottas. That explains
[25:57.680 -> 26:05.000] to me why Hamilton and Verstappen are S-tier. So if Bottas was the lead Mercedes driver in 2017
[26:05.600 -> 26:08.880] and you had Verstappen in the 2017 Ferrari,
[26:08.880 -> 26:12.080] 100% that's a Ferrari championship.
[26:12.080 -> 26:14.280] I agree with you, I'm agreeing with you, 100%.
[26:14.280 -> 26:17.840] That's interesting because it's early in Verstappen's career
[26:17.840 -> 26:19.920] and back then I didn't think of him the way
[26:19.920 -> 26:21.480] we think of him now, you know?
[26:21.480 -> 26:22.320] That's interesting.
[26:22.320 -> 26:23.720] Let's focus in on 2017.
[26:23.720 -> 26:30.920] Who, okay, Bottas in the Mercedes, who's a very good driver, but that whole team was based around Lewis Hamilton
[26:30.920 -> 26:36.820] at the time. So Bottas is the lead driver at Mercedes. Who do we put into the 2017 Ferrari
[26:36.820 -> 26:41.600] to win a title at that time? There's a few there, like Alonso. Alonso picks up that title.
[26:41.600 -> 26:46.160] There we go. For sure. Finally, if he sticks with Ferrari, which he
[26:46.160 -> 26:52.320] didn't. Oh yeah, oh, goodness, I just, I forgot. He was like, he literally dumped Ferrari to go and
[26:52.320 -> 26:57.360] to join the great McLaren project. Oh, well, good question that, Chris. I think, actually,
[26:57.360 -> 27:07.200] I'm going to listen back to this and I'm going to pick up on all the threads and reclassify those as topics. So moving on, let's go to a question from Michael.
[27:07.200 -> 27:13.560] Michael Albon says, over the years it seems like in most race reviews at least one of the panelists
[27:13.560 -> 27:19.160] says something like, you can't draw too many conclusions because this isn't a representative
[27:19.160 -> 27:25.400] track. I do say that a lot. I love your analysis that the first six or seven races are unrepresentative
[27:25.400 -> 27:31.320] and the problems it poses for F1 as a whole. I don't hear that argument elsewhere, unless
[27:31.320 -> 27:36.400] I'm on a show, in which case I shout about it all the time. I wanted to ask how many
[27:36.400 -> 27:43.400] of the 23 tracks on the calendar are representative in your eyes? In my estimation, over half
[27:43.400 -> 27:45.500] of the tracks are unrepresentative.
[27:45.500 -> 27:48.500] I mean, that's the beauty, Christian, of Formula One in a way, isn't it?
[27:48.500 -> 27:53.000] Imagine playing football every week, just on an entirely different pitch.
[27:53.000 -> 27:57.000] Sometimes it's a pyramid shape, sometimes it's sloping to the left,
[27:57.000 -> 27:59.000] sometimes wind, sometimes in the sea.
[27:59.000 -> 28:04.500] There is track evolution, like in design, right?
[28:04.500 -> 28:09.920] Back in the days, tracks were tarmac, grass, the ends.
[28:09.920 -> 28:10.920] Hay bales.
[28:10.920 -> 28:11.920] Hay bales, yeah.
[28:11.920 -> 28:18.920] Nowadays, I think you spend more money on safety than you spend on tarmac when it comes
[28:18.920 -> 28:20.200] down to it.
[28:20.200 -> 28:25.160] So the evolution of revolution, or whatever you call call it of tracks is one thing.
[28:25.200 -> 28:29.920] Then you have the cars, they have a formula that you sort of like follow.
[28:30.080 -> 28:33.080] So if you wanted the car just to go fast, you would go into the desert,
[28:33.080 -> 28:33.960] you would build a rocket.
[28:34.080 -> 28:37.760] If you want it to go fast on gravel and jump, you would maybe try to take an
[28:37.880 -> 28:39.000] extreme E car.
[28:39.520 -> 28:49.920] What is the word representative, I think means what would be the most consistent racetrack
[28:49.920 -> 28:51.300] on a calendar.
[28:51.300 -> 28:56.880] And that is constantly evolving, of course, but you build the car to be fastest overall.
[28:56.880 -> 29:09.040] You could basically take all the lap times from the entire year and it's all math basically. So if you can build a car that goes fast in, we all
[29:09.040 -> 29:15.840] talk about Spain or Spa or somewhere like that, that holds a braking zone, high speed,
[29:15.840 -> 29:20.920] medium speed, low speed, has it all, if you can build a car that goes fast around there,
[29:20.920 -> 29:25.500] you have a good car. Up until now, we've only had tracks that...
[29:25.500 -> 29:29.380] We have had a lot of Baku-ish style tracks.
[29:29.380 -> 29:30.380] We have.
[29:30.380 -> 29:31.980] And Baku is a track that is...
[29:31.980 -> 29:36.860] It's a good example because Baku is basically just 90 degrees corners.
[29:36.860 -> 29:41.220] You drive there, you brake, you turn the car, you put down the throttle.
[29:41.220 -> 29:43.420] You brake, you turn, throttle.
[29:43.420 -> 29:45.240] It's the most boring way to drive a racing car.
[29:45.760 -> 29:48.520] And the cars are basically not built for any of that.
[29:48.560 -> 29:53.560] Baku somehow goes against the entire premise of a Formula
[29:53.560 -> 29:55.080] One car, if you look at it that way.
[29:55.600 -> 29:58.040] So, so that is what I think Spanner means.
[29:58.080 -> 30:02.120] Spanner means when he say representative, and when we go to the more European
[30:02.120 -> 30:07.000] tracks, Sandvalds, Spa, Monza, stuff like that, that
[30:07.000 -> 30:11.520] would be where the cars shine according to how they are built.
[30:11.520 -> 30:13.320] And I think that's what you mean, right?
[30:13.320 -> 30:16.960] And I think it's got to be, to me, it's Barcelona always.
[30:16.960 -> 30:21.680] And it's not just because people have this sort of, in their head, Barcelona is the main
[30:21.680 -> 30:25.720] test track and they go, well, that's what uses the representative times.
[30:25.720 -> 30:29.440] It's Barcelona has got high speed corners, medium speed and slow speed.
[30:29.440 -> 30:31.540] It's got a long straight to hit your V-Max.
[30:31.540 -> 30:34.760] It's got great DRS zone, if you want to test that out.
[30:34.760 -> 30:36.320] Is that really part of testing?
[30:36.320 -> 30:37.560] Probably shouldn't have said that, but anyway.
[30:37.560 -> 30:41.560] So you've got a whole heap of stuff going on in Barcelona.
[30:41.560 -> 30:47.420] At the end of the day, it also, and it's a very good question sent in by Michael Albon,
[30:47.420 -> 30:49.820] no relation to Alex Albon, may I say it potentially?
[30:49.820 -> 30:50.820] We don't know.
[30:50.820 -> 30:51.820] We can't know.
[30:51.820 -> 30:52.820] I'm not sure, we don't know.
[30:52.820 -> 30:53.820] It's impossible to know.
[30:53.820 -> 30:54.820] Yeah.
[30:54.820 -> 30:56.820] Otherwise we'll, uh, yeah, cause, yeah.
[30:56.820 -> 31:11.840] Anyway, I think that the fact that the beauty of F1, and this is the great part of the question, is the beauty of F1 is we don't know which car's the quickest at, you know, overall, because, well, I take that back,
[31:11.840 -> 31:15.360] actually, because so far I look at this year's sort of pecking order, and Red Bull's been the
[31:15.360 -> 31:19.680] quickest at every track. So that, actually, I take back what I said there. But there are certain
[31:19.680 -> 31:24.000] things that you can look at F1 that, and this is where the beauty comes in, if a car's good at
[31:24.000 -> 31:29.800] Monaco, for example, expect that same car to be good at Singapore. Not all the time, but it gives you a
[31:29.800 -> 31:35.640] rough idea going into that round, and that can be a racetracker team target. So we remember this back
[31:35.640 -> 31:43.000] in before the turbo hybrid era, I remember back to the era before this, 2010. The McLaren at the
[31:43.000 -> 31:46.680] time and the Ferraris always did well at your Monzas and Spars and those
[31:46.680 -> 31:48.040] kinds of circuits.
[31:48.040 -> 31:50.400] Your Red Bulls did well at the aero kind of circuits.
[31:50.400 -> 31:51.960] Overall, who's the quickest car?
[31:51.960 -> 31:53.240] The quickest car generally wins.
[31:53.240 -> 31:56.400] I think at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what circuit you go to, you're always
[31:56.400 -> 31:59.200] going to find the quickest car over the course of a calendar.
[31:59.200 -> 32:03.440] There's not 20 Monzas, there's not 20 Monaco's.
[32:03.440 -> 32:06.120] It's the beauty of F1 that we do have a variety of racetracks and I don't think it
[32:06.120 -> 32:08.200] affects the championship too much.
[32:08.200 -> 32:13.560] What sets Formula 1 apart from all other racing series and what amazes every racing driver
[32:13.560 -> 32:17.000] is the braking force of a Formula 1 car.
[32:17.000 -> 32:28.160] And I would say, if you look at Formula 1 as a racing spec formula, the brakes and what happens from around 120, 30 kilometers an hour up
[32:28.160 -> 32:37.240] to 200. How the drivability of the car is in that space of speed. That is where it
[32:37.240 -> 32:42.880] sets it apart from everything else. And that is basically math as well. So if you
[32:42.880 -> 32:46.080] wanted you could say, okay why don't we build next year's
[32:46.080 -> 32:50.800] Red Bulls do 90 degree corners like no one else.
[32:50.880 -> 32:52.760] It just goes around the 90 degree.
[32:52.760 -> 32:54.600] A cup Baku is going to be a piece of cake.
[32:55.040 -> 32:59.520] There's not enough to gain by being good at a 90 degree corner.
[32:59.920 -> 33:08.240] If you go that way, even if there was more 90 degree corners, what you gain from being good in the areas the Formula 1 cars are good at today
[33:08.800 -> 33:09.920] is going to win you always.
[33:11.680 -> 33:17.600] I'm just realizing, listening to you guys talk, and I go, I say this a lot.
[33:17.600 -> 33:24.000] I talk about the representative tracks a lot, and I have a bias from the 90s.
[33:24.000 -> 33:29.560] While you were talking, I was Googling various race calendars from 1988,
[33:29.560 -> 33:36.360] and so I've settled on 1998, where I would have been 17 years old and turning 18 that year.
[33:36.360 -> 33:42.360] And if I look at this calendar, it's all the tracks that I think are representative,
[33:42.360 -> 33:45.520] with a couple of exceptions. So it kicks off with Albert Park.
[33:45.880 -> 33:47.280] Okay, fair enough.
[33:47.280 -> 33:49.440] But once we go now into the...
[33:49.440 -> 33:51.160] Which is not really a representative.
[33:51.160 -> 33:54.240] No, and Australia likes to deliver us,
[33:54.240 -> 33:59.200] sorry, Jono, Australia, I get why it's early in the F1 calendar.
[33:59.200 -> 34:01.360] And I enjoy the fact that the F1 season starts
[34:01.360 -> 34:03.280] and I have to get up at five o'clock in the morning.
[34:03.520 -> 34:09.120] And you guys, you don't know what it's like. We don't know how much we suffer. Can I say quickly, sorry to cut
[34:09.120 -> 34:13.680] you off, is I would rather my home track not be a representative circuit because it means it's
[34:13.680 -> 34:19.280] more fun. Yeah. So in the olden days, it's always like we go to Australia, it's almost like a
[34:19.280 -> 34:23.840] shakedown with points is how I've kind of thought about it. It's nice, it's enjoyable, but we don't
[34:23.840 -> 34:29.520] draw any conclusions from that. You know, you never panic if your driver isn't doing well at the Australian
[34:29.520 -> 34:36.480] Grand Prix. But if you look at this, the Interlagos was race two in 1998, and then it was the olden
[34:36.480 -> 34:41.680] days Argentinian Grand Prix, Imola. And remember, these are a completely different spec of race car.
[34:41.680 -> 34:45.360] Imola there, maybe not quite as tight and twisty as it feels
[34:45.360 -> 34:53.200] today. Then you've got Catalunya, Monaco, Canadian Grand Prix, Manicoua, Silverstone,
[34:53.200 -> 35:01.120] Red Bull Ring, Hockenheim, Hongaro Ring, Spa, Monza, Nordschleife. Oh, was that the GP circuit
[35:01.120 -> 35:08.880] at Nürburgring? There we go. Yeah. And also, and then Suzuka. All of those tracks to me feel like traditional F1 tracks.
[35:08.880 -> 35:11.480] So have I got kind of an old man bias now
[35:11.480 -> 35:13.560] where when you bring in something different,
[35:13.560 -> 35:15.960] I go, well, that's not representative.
[35:15.960 -> 35:19.300] I don't think so because I look at the modern tracks
[35:19.300 -> 35:21.920] that have come in and I love a lot of the newer tracks.
[35:21.920 -> 35:25.920] So I love the Shanghai, the Malaysian Grand Prix,
[35:25.920 -> 35:30.160] the Korean track, I thought was great. Indian Grand Prix, those Tilco drones, great.
[35:30.960 -> 35:35.200] Circuit of the Americas is one of my top three tracks at the moment. But yeah,
[35:35.200 -> 35:39.200] so I think when I talk about representative tracks, I think I'm just lingering on
[35:39.840 -> 35:46.120] the street tracks that have come in. And I will stick by this. They've gone mad. They've
[35:46.120 -> 35:50.560] gone for the street tracks because it brings in money and I'm sure there's deals with those
[35:50.560 -> 35:56.400] cities and there's a glamour to it. And in all of those negotiations, those tracks either
[35:56.400 -> 36:01.120] want to be really early in the calendar or super late in the calendar. They're the premium
[36:01.120 -> 36:05.800] spots I think in the calendar for promo, and I think money has
[36:05.800 -> 36:09.360] been thrown at that. And that's why we've ended up with the start of the season for
[36:09.360 -> 36:15.520] two seasons in a row where everyone is complaining bitterly that it's boring and terrible. But
[36:15.520 -> 36:20.840] when we, hopefully, when we get into the more normal tracks, it's going to recover. Am I
[36:20.840 -> 36:26.800] just an old man? I'm an old man yelling at clouds. Jono, you're relatively relevant, age-wise.
[36:26.800 -> 36:27.800] Am I nuts?
[36:27.800 -> 36:32.880] No, no, I don't think you're nuts, but you've got a great point there.
[36:32.880 -> 36:36.760] Part of the street circuit fascination is countries and cities don't have to commit
[36:36.760 -> 36:39.320] to permanent racetracks, which costs a lot.
[36:39.320 -> 36:43.120] And they tried to do that with Malaysia, and now Malaysia doesn't even host...
[36:43.120 -> 36:46.040] I don't even know if that track still exists anymore in Sepang.
[36:46.040 -> 36:47.040] I don't know.
[36:47.040 -> 36:48.040] It's been so long.
[36:48.040 -> 36:49.040] I used to love that circuit.
[36:49.040 -> 36:50.640] It might come back actually.
[36:50.640 -> 36:51.640] And I hope it does.
[36:51.640 -> 36:53.360] And I have heard some stuff about that, Christian.
[36:53.360 -> 36:55.720] And I really hope Sepang's back on the calendar.
[36:55.720 -> 36:59.520] Very bumpy, good old tropical weather over there in Sepang.
[36:59.520 -> 37:05.520] But back to your point is, you say all those circuits, old school circuits back in 1998, are you saying that those were more representative? Or are you just saying you just all those circuits, you know, old school circuits back in 1998, are you saying
[37:05.520 -> 37:08.800] that those were more representative? Or are you just saying you just enjoyed those circuits?
[37:08.800 -> 37:12.640] Are we changing the topic slightly? No, I'm thinking that the reason I say they're
[37:12.640 -> 37:17.920] representative is because they're representative of what I know as F1, and if you maybe started
[37:17.920 -> 37:26.000] watching 10 years ago, I'm a little bit out of touch. I reckon that's an old man thing, because some of those circuits, like the Hungara Ring was new, I don't think that's it I reckon and I reckon that's old man thing because some of those circuits
[37:26.000 -> 37:30.300] like the Hungara ring was new I don't think that's a representative circuit at all.
[37:30.300 -> 37:32.520] What else in that calendar is kind of new?
[37:32.520 -> 37:37.000] Albert Park was kind of new I mean yeah it existed for 40 years but the modern day version
[37:37.000 -> 37:41.840] of Albert Park you know Monaco I don't know like the Red Bull ring do we really think
[37:41.840 -> 37:44.640] the A1 ring was Christian?
[37:44.640 -> 37:47.400] Do we really think that that was a representative circuit?
[37:47.400 -> 37:49.120] No, the altitude there doesn't help us.
[37:49.120 -> 37:50.240] There's always a different winner there.
[37:50.240 -> 37:50.960] Mexico as well.
[37:50.960 -> 37:51.240] Yeah.
[37:51.880 -> 37:52.160] Yeah.
[37:52.440 -> 37:54.240] So Christian, you're older than me.
[37:54.240 -> 37:57.760] Some of the new tracks that I added are really interesting.
[37:57.760 -> 37:58.920] I love Saudi Arabia.
[37:58.920 -> 38:01.040] I know Spanish, you're not up on Saudi Arabia.
[38:01.040 -> 38:04.080] You think it's a death trap and stuff like that and missiles flying.
[38:04.080 -> 38:04.680] I haven't said anything.
[38:04.680 -> 38:09.840] But I like the environment. I think they did something unique with Saudi Arabia,
[38:09.840 -> 38:16.160] they built a high-speed Formula One track in a city. Maybe those things don't combine so well
[38:16.160 -> 38:20.800] when you think of it, but I actually do like the racing. So I think there's a little bit of,
[38:21.680 -> 38:26.120] is U2 ever going to make a new With or Without You?
[38:26.120 -> 38:27.120] Probably not.
[38:27.120 -> 38:29.520] It's not going to be as good as the original one, right?
[38:29.520 -> 38:34.200] And the first time we kissed someone, the first time we danced to something, all those
[38:34.200 -> 38:36.400] memories are just going to last.
[38:36.400 -> 38:39.520] Oh, well, you're taking me back now.
[38:39.520 -> 38:44.680] First kiss was to Was Not Was, Was Not Was, Walking the Dinosaur.
[38:44.680 -> 38:46.000] Can't your family hear you in the background?
[38:46.000 -> 38:48.080] Because I've told all this story.
[38:48.080 -> 38:51.200] I think it was The Final Countdown.
[38:51.200 -> 38:54.000] Actually, I know that's quite cliché.
[38:54.000 -> 38:54.320] Nice.
[38:55.360 -> 38:58.560] I would have thought both your first kisses would be at the Little Mermaid in Denmark.
[38:59.920 -> 39:00.880] Evidently not.
[39:00.880 -> 39:06.520] I'm pretty sure Meatloaf had a big part in all this conversation, but we must move on
[39:06.520 -> 39:15.080] to another topic.
[39:15.080 -> 39:20.400] I could linger on the topic of early love and I would do anything for love, but I won't
[39:20.400 -> 39:24.440] do that to you guys because we're moving on with the questions.
[39:24.440 -> 39:27.200] You could have let that go, Christian. You didn't have to do that.
[39:28.040 -> 39:29.680] Speculation time. Let's see.
[39:29.680 -> 39:34.640] Scott asks a question and says, Greetings from Portland, Oregon,
[39:34.840 -> 39:37.160] which I think is in Alaska. I'm not sure.
[39:37.200 -> 39:39.320] I'm not up on my American geography.
[39:39.320 -> 39:42.480] First of all, thank you for being for the hard work on the podcast.
[39:42.800 -> 39:44.000] I really enjoy listening.
[39:44.000 -> 39:47.140] Being that Spanners is such a staunch neutral,
[39:47.140 -> 39:48.720] good point, Scott,
[39:48.720 -> 39:51.240] this question is probably aimed for the rest of the panel.
[39:51.240 -> 39:53.160] I am a Ferrari fan.
[39:53.160 -> 39:54.540] Oh, I'm so sorry.
[39:54.540 -> 39:55.480] I'm sorry, Scott.
[39:55.480 -> 39:57.660] And just so you know, we're here for you.
[39:57.660 -> 40:00.200] Anytime you wanna talk, just get in touch
[40:00.200 -> 40:01.280] and we'll be there.
[40:01.280 -> 40:03.480] It's tragic, it's tragic, Christian, I know.
[40:03.480 -> 40:04.520] I know.
[40:04.520 -> 40:08.320] It says, I do have hope for a strong
[40:08.320 -> 40:14.240] second half with Charles and Carlos. Oh bless him, he has hope. Okay, let's see what we can do to
[40:14.240 -> 40:19.760] mitigate against that. He continues, it seemed to me that they were matching Alonso's pace
[40:19.760 -> 40:26.880] with one fewer stop in Canada. Obviously, they had a difficult Saturday. Was this primarily due to being able to run in open air and manage,
[40:26.880 -> 40:31.600] or have they cleaned up the tyre degradation issues through upgrades and have a shot of
[40:31.600 -> 40:36.480] podiums for the balance of the year? Given that excessive tyre deg was Ferrari's main issue,
[40:36.480 -> 40:40.640] it seems significant to me that they could run well in Canada, and not many people are
[40:40.640 -> 40:49.200] talking about it thanks in advance, Scott. Now, I need to be clear that I have warmed to my Tifosi brethren,
[40:49.200 -> 40:52.880] and in the olden days, yes, of course, you were the stormtroopers
[40:52.880 -> 40:57.600] swarming in my social media, in my comment sections,
[40:57.600 -> 40:59.280] but now you have converted-
[40:59.280 -> 41:02.160] Did the stormtroopers end up joining the good people in the end?
[41:02.160 -> 41:03.040] I think they did, right?
[41:04.160 -> 41:05.200] No, did they not?
[41:06.320 -> 41:12.240] Okay, well I'll have to think of an analogy where generally baddies ended up being quite good.
[41:12.240 -> 41:18.000] But I even have now, I would say, genuinely I have got friends that are Ferrari fans.
[41:18.000 -> 41:23.280] So I think we're at that point. But what I don't want is to give them false hope.
[41:23.280 -> 41:27.460] But what can you do for Scott, Jono? Do you
[41:27.460 -> 41:30.260] see them pushing for podiums over the season?
[41:30.260 -> 41:35.420] Essentially, yes. And it all comes down to Red Bull's development time dropping due to
[41:35.420 -> 41:40.300] the cost cap issues they had in 2021. Is that going to affect their development time this
[41:40.300 -> 41:44.700] year? And that means everybody will catch up. The question is, will Ferrari then leap
[41:44.700 -> 41:49.720] Aston Martin and Mercedes to become the second quickest car? That's the question there.
[41:49.720 -> 41:55.320] I still believe in the theory that the Ferrari power unit is the quickest in this era, in
[41:55.320 -> 42:01.800] the engine freeze, or the power unit freeze, till 2025. And the reason I believe that is,
[42:01.800 -> 42:05.660] and the rumour was that came out at the end of last year, that they've gone for
[42:05.660 -> 42:10.400] quickest PU, but bad reliability. Now, the only thing you can change under the next few
[42:10.400 -> 42:14.520] years under the rule set is your reliability. Whereas Mercedes, for example, went with the
[42:14.520 -> 42:20.360] opposite, and that's why Mercedes cars weren't as quick to begin the era. Point is, if Ferrari
[42:20.360 -> 42:24.800] get their reliability right, and that rumor is true, and they keep increasing the reliability,
[42:24.800 -> 42:27.680] they can run the power unit a lot faster.
[42:27.680 -> 42:30.480] And that's the key to winning in this era, I think, so far.
[42:30.480 -> 42:32.960] Aero, mechanical grip, all that kind of stuff,
[42:32.960 -> 42:36.200] it's important, but it's down to,
[42:36.200 -> 42:38.200] are we going to see a strong second half
[42:38.200 -> 42:39.040] for Charles and Carlos?
[42:39.040 -> 42:39.880] Potentially.
[42:39.880 -> 42:42.960] Are we going to see a strong 2024 and 2025?
[42:42.960 -> 42:45.120] That's what Ferrari have designed this entire
[42:45.120 -> 42:50.600] car and this entire strategy to, is for the last couple of years of this power unit phrase.
[42:50.600 -> 42:51.600] That's what I believe.
[42:51.600 -> 42:53.680] Oh my God, that was pathetically hopeful.
[42:53.680 -> 42:55.760] Christian, bring some sanity to this.
[42:55.760 -> 42:58.200] I'm just going to put down one line.
[42:58.200 -> 43:00.080] I'm just going to read it, okay?
[43:00.080 -> 43:04.640] Scott, I don't know, but I believe in Fred Vasseur and big things are happening on the
[43:04.640 -> 43:11.200] personal front these days. I'm sad to say my Ferrari stopwatch is set to 24.
[43:11.200 -> 43:19.760] Is that your words, Christian? You've basically wiped the Ferrari calendar clear for 2023.
[43:19.760 -> 43:25.840] But I think Fred Vasseur is... I believe in that guy. I think he can do something.
[43:25.840 -> 43:28.180] Why justify that?
[43:28.180 -> 43:33.600] He has some oil in his fingers, but also he's a bright fellow.
[43:33.600 -> 43:36.300] He knows the other team principles.
[43:36.300 -> 43:37.300] He knows the drivers.
[43:37.300 -> 43:42.720] A lot of the drivers used to drive for Fred Vasseur when they were growing up carding.
[43:42.720 -> 43:46.720] He has the right context. There's something about Fred Vasseur.
[43:47.000 -> 43:52.400] And I think we need to give him this year to hire the right people, get things calm,
[43:52.400 -> 43:57.560] but do something about the strategy stuff, calm the drivers, neutralize.
[43:57.560 -> 43:58.060] Okay.
[43:58.640 -> 44:02.320] As we said last year and the year before that and the year before that, but still.
[44:02.600 -> 44:05.280] We're being joined live by our patron Slack group,
[44:05.280 -> 44:11.760] of course. So EJ in our patron Slack group is saying to Scott, look, this is a safe place.
[44:11.760 -> 44:17.760] And Wes has said, wow, this poor soul, it keeps getting worse and worse as you read. Mark simply
[44:17.760 -> 44:31.740] says no to all of Scott's email. Pete says, surely Ferrari have used their quota of mistakes, so they're going to be great for the next 10 seasons. So there's no shared optimism in our Patreon Slack group.
[44:31.740 -> 44:36.840] Oh, by the way, if you want to be a patron, it is a safe place. It's a multi-faith community.
[44:36.840 -> 44:43.020] So there are people of all broad spectrums and beliefs in the F1 community. We've got
[44:43.020 -> 44:45.100] Red Bull fans in there. We have.
[44:45.100 -> 44:46.600] We've got Ferrari fans in there.
[44:46.600 -> 44:48.400] I've seen a few Alpine fans.
[44:48.400 -> 44:51.000] I've seen French F1 fans in our Patreon Slack group.
[44:51.000 -> 44:52.100] Consider joining us.
[44:52.100 -> 44:55.000] Patreon.com forward slash MissedApex.
[44:55.000 -> 44:58.200] I'm going to post right now in the livestream group
[44:58.200 -> 45:00.200] a car crash I once had.
[45:00.200 -> 45:01.200] Really? Why?
[45:01.200 -> 45:03.900] That's exclusive because exclusivity.
[45:03.900 -> 45:05.000] Oh, so you're offering that as exclusive content. Really? Why? That's exclusive because... Oh wow! Exclusivity!
[45:05.000 -> 45:06.000] Oh, so you're offering that as exclusive content?
[45:06.000 -> 45:07.000] Yeah, exactly!
[45:07.000 -> 45:10.000] Let's see Christian Pedersen crashing in a go-kart.
[45:10.000 -> 45:13.000] And there's all sorts of other reasons to support us,
[45:13.000 -> 45:17.000] but mostly it's so that we can continue producing content like this
[45:17.000 -> 45:20.000] without being in a blind freelancer panic
[45:20.000 -> 45:23.000] that everything is going to crumble away under our feet.
[45:23.000 -> 45:26.000] Patreon.com forward slash
[45:26.000 -> 45:32.960] missed apex. Hope to see you there. Right. We're still on Ferrari. So yeah, the thing is,
[45:32.960 -> 45:39.120] this season, Jono, I think you're right. I think they have soundly fallen back to fourth place,
[45:39.120 -> 45:47.000] I think. And I feel like they're going to be there for a while. This is a good excuse to briefly move to what you said about Red Bull when you're saying
[45:47.000 -> 45:50.400] are the cost cap implications going to kick in?
[45:50.400 -> 45:53.600] I know, basically, is what I think.
[45:53.600 -> 45:56.000] I think it's not affecting them at all.
[45:56.000 -> 45:58.960] And this is what we were talking about at the time they got the penalty.
[45:58.960 -> 46:04.320] Blew in the face I was, saying no, this is not going to affect them.
[46:04.320 -> 46:05.960] And everyone said no, it's really such a
[46:05.960 -> 46:12.280] significant penalty. And I just don't think it was. Maybe coupled a little bit with the
[46:12.280 -> 46:18.640] penalty for finishing first as a success ballast. But they've already talked about turning their
[46:18.640 -> 46:30.840] attention to 2024 and we're seven races in. So no, it clearly hasn't been a penalty. Even if they turn to 2024 now, I think Red Bull feel like they've got it in the bag
[46:30.840 -> 46:34.840] and that's why they can do that, especially with Mercedes saying,
[46:34.840 -> 46:38.840] this concept is good, we think we're going to be fighting Red Bull after Silverstone,
[46:38.840 -> 46:43.240] but we need to look to 2024. That's what Lewis Hamilton has been saying.
[46:43.240 -> 46:49.200] So no, it's not going to affect them, even though with both of those teams turning their attention to 2024,
[46:49.200 -> 47:06.480] I can't see Ferrari challenging either of them. the most exciting way to play Daily Fantasy Sports. Just select two or more players, pick more or less on their projection
[47:06.480 -> 47:08.200] for a wide variety of stats,
[47:08.200 -> 47:09.700] and place your entry.
[47:09.700 -> 47:11.120] It's as easy as that.
[47:11.120 -> 47:12.400] If you have the skills,
[47:12.400 -> 47:17.400] you can turn $10 into $250 with just a few taps.
[47:17.560 -> 47:19.240] Easy gameplay, quick withdrawals,
[47:19.240 -> 47:20.880] and injury insurance on your picks
[47:20.880 -> 47:22.360] are what make PrizePicks
[47:22.360 -> 47:24.800] the number one Daily Fantasy Sports app.
[47:24.800 -> 47:28.940] Ready to test your skills? Join the Prize Picks community of more than 7 million
[47:28.940 -> 47:33.540] players who have already signed up. Right now, Prize Picks will match your first
[47:33.540 -> 47:39.540] deposit up to $100. Just visit prizepicks.com slash get100 and use code
[47:39.540 -> 47:48.880] get100. That's code get100 at prizepicks.com slash get100 for a first deposit matchup to $100.
[47:48.880 -> 47:58.840] Prize Picks, daily fantasy sports made easy.
[47:58.840 -> 48:03.560] That's the point, but look, the cost cap penalty didn't come in until late last year and they've
[48:03.560 -> 48:10.000] already developed – developments and car advantages come months and months ahead of time.
[48:10.000 -> 48:13.840] So by the time the penalty kicks in and by the time it affects development, it is going
[48:13.840 -> 48:16.000] to be the end of this year that we finally see it.
[48:16.000 -> 48:19.400] And we're already seeing the car sort of, I don't want to say decline in pace, but
[48:19.400 -> 48:21.480] the other teams are catching up.
[48:21.480 -> 48:26.600] Now, the problem for Ferrari as well and switching back to Ferrari is Scott
[48:26.600 -> 48:30.320] mentioned the tie-dag issue that he says not enough people are talking about it and yes,
[48:30.320 -> 48:34.720] that is a factor that's coming to play this year. But the cost cap, I think, is Ferrari's
[48:34.720 -> 48:40.200] biggest downfall. They were a team who are renowned for pouring money into a sport and
[48:40.200 -> 48:44.240] not getting enough value out of the money they put in. The whole point of the cost cap
[48:44.240 -> 48:45.840] is the complete opposite theory,
[48:45.840 -> 48:47.600] is make the most of little money,
[48:47.600 -> 48:48.420] because everybody's going to be
[48:48.420 -> 48:50.240] on the same sort of level playing field.
[48:50.240 -> 48:53.840] Ferrari can't mismanage a $600 million budget
[48:53.840 -> 48:57.600] and barely beat a team on a $450 million budget,
[48:57.600 -> 48:58.680] for example.
[48:58.680 -> 49:00.720] Now that they're all going to spend the same amount
[49:00.720 -> 49:03.120] on a cost cap, it's only going to get worse for Ferrari.
[49:03.120 -> 49:05.640] And so to me, that's the other side of it.
[49:05.640 -> 49:10.720] This is where the side that switches, the question is, to me, the downfall of Ferrari
[49:10.720 -> 49:15.000] right now is they need to find a way to change their sort of, I don't want to say culture
[49:15.000 -> 49:18.920] or anything like that, but figure out how to make the most of value for money now.
[49:18.920 -> 49:21.060] It's not like the last 20 years.
[49:21.060 -> 49:25.000] What if they took their brain and they used it twice?
[49:25.000 -> 49:31.000] So to get more aero time, they were just finishing lower in the constructions.
[49:31.000 -> 49:34.000] Then you would get more aero next year.
[49:34.000 -> 49:38.000] So basically, you're just saying, we take the brain and we use it twice.
[49:38.000 -> 49:42.000] So if you're saying to me that Ferrari will just dump this season,
[49:42.000 -> 49:48.640] like an NBA basketball team should pack… Like they did the last 10 seasons to get enough time in the winter.
[49:48.640 -> 49:51.520] Is that what they've been doing for all these years?
[49:52.160 -> 49:53.120] They've been tanking.
[49:53.120 -> 49:56.800] Genius. I take it all back. I take it all back, Ferrari.
[49:56.800 -> 49:58.240] You're absolute geniuses.
[49:58.240 -> 50:01.360] But you know, maybe, you may as well at this point
[50:01.360 -> 50:04.240] settle for fourth place and start developing for 2024.
[50:04.240 -> 50:09.440] Sorry, we couldn't be more positive about that, Scott. Also, not at all sorry.
[50:09.440 -> 50:12.560] So let's move on to another listener question.
[50:20.240 -> 50:26.080] This might be a quick one here from Justin, but it's a reasonable question. We talk a lot about tire
[50:26.640 -> 50:30.740] Strategy instead of messing with the tires in order to get rid of one-stop races
[50:30.740 -> 50:35.620] Which I think everyone on this panel doesn't like and causing more two to three stoppers
[50:35.660 -> 50:42.160] Why don't we simply make the races longer? Sure Max can do 50 laps on some mediums, but could he do 70?
[50:42.160 -> 50:48.280] I'm aware of the two-hour time limit, but that seems like something that could be changed and bargained for. So I'm going to go first
[50:48.280 -> 50:53.680] on this one and say, Justin, thank you very much for your email. That is a disgusting
[50:53.680 -> 50:59.520] suggestion because that is the gateway to Le Mans 24, which although I very much enjoyed
[50:59.520 -> 51:06.800] for the duration of the barbecue I was at, wild horses couldn't drag me to care about the Le Mans 24-hour race
[51:06.800 -> 51:12.480] once I'd gone to sleep, fully gone to sleep and woken up on a whole nother day and then
[51:12.480 -> 51:18.480] cared about the race that was still happening. No, Formula 1 is about the right length, two hours is
[51:18.480 -> 51:26.600] about the right length, but it's an interesting what-if, Jono. What if they just made the races four hours long?
[51:26.600 -> 51:30.560] Would that solve all the tyre stuff? Obviously, the fuel then comes into it.
[51:30.560 -> 51:34.480] No, and there's a common trend throughout the world in that the best sports out there
[51:34.480 -> 51:39.760] in the world are sort of around that two hour length as a Formula One race is. Now, what
[51:39.760 -> 51:44.040] you'd have to consider here is, can the power units last? That'll probably increase costs,
[51:44.040 -> 51:45.360] because then you need to increase the amount of
[51:45.360 -> 51:48.440] power units you need to use over the course of a season. It goes
[51:48.440 -> 51:51.820] against Formula One's theory of sort of reducing costs, which is
[51:51.820 -> 51:54.240] what they're trying to do right now, with the cost cap and all
[51:54.240 -> 51:57.440] that kind of stuff as well. I don't think that's the cause.
[51:57.440 -> 52:01.000] And I think, look, we can get two to three stop races with the
[52:01.000 -> 52:13.600] old 2011 Pirelli tires. We had three to four stop races back then when they first came in. So I don't think, um, are we, is there, is there an end goal with this question, Justin,
[52:13.600 -> 52:19.440] that he's aiming for? Is it for more entertainment? Is it just to find out if Max can do 50 laps on a
[52:19.440 -> 52:28.480] certain set of tyres? What's the end goal for this? I think it's just a desperation to see, and I feel it as well, an end to the one stops
[52:28.480 -> 52:33.960] because the whole point of the Pirelli era was to create a tyre delta with cars on track
[52:33.960 -> 52:38.640] with different strategies. And when you have a basic one stop, you don't really see it.
[52:38.640 -> 52:43.760] You've got two choices, either plan A or the George Russell plan, which is go a bit longer,
[52:43.760 -> 52:45.360] hope for a safety car. And
[52:45.360 -> 52:49.720] that's not the most interesting way at the moment to get around these tracks. I think
[52:49.720 -> 52:54.120] if you're going to persist with one stop races, then just forget it. Forget about the whole
[52:54.120 -> 52:58.280] Pirelli plan. Get Bridgestone in. Just have durable tyres and just go. Because there's
[52:58.280 -> 53:04.520] no difference between just having really good race cars, really good race tyres, and the
[53:04.520 -> 53:06.520] current Pirelli plan now.
[53:06.520 -> 53:09.280] They're not doing the wear thing, Christian, that's all.
[53:09.280 -> 53:11.180] I think, again, as Jonathan's saying,
[53:12.240 -> 53:14.500] the question is, why the question?
[53:15.360 -> 53:17.280] What do we want to gain?
[53:18.640 -> 53:22.200] Back in the days, the cars were made to basically break down
[53:22.200 -> 53:23.960] when they've crossed the finishing line.
[53:23.960 -> 53:28.880] I know the cars aren't built like that today, but they are still all built at a limit.
[53:28.880 -> 53:34.280] And that is why we had the debate when we introduced the sprint races.
[53:34.280 -> 53:39.240] All the engine manufacturers were going, but if we're going to do six sprint races, which
[53:39.240 -> 53:46.280] is X kilometers, then we need one more engine in the regulations, yada yada, more money for
[53:46.280 -> 53:50.680] engines, yada yada. So everything works together basically. But I think the main thing is the
[53:50.680 -> 54:01.520] first thing that Jonathan was talking about is how we as humans, what's our span of attention?
[54:01.520 -> 54:02.520] Two hours is the limit, basically.
[54:02.520 -> 54:05.120] Yeah, I think you're right.
[54:05.120 -> 54:09.440] Honestly, I literally, I went in with the best intentions for Le Mans, right?
[54:09.440 -> 54:12.640] And I've always said, it's way too long, you should just have shorter races.
[54:12.640 -> 54:18.240] I go to Brad Philpott's Le Mans party, great party, lovely company, amazing.
[54:18.240 -> 54:22.400] And I went in there and I was honest, like, I don't feel like I'm going to be converted.
[54:22.400 -> 54:28.040] So my aim is just to sit here and not actively ruin it for everyone else,
[54:28.280 -> 54:30.680] which I did. So I went in there with enthusiasm.
[54:31.640 -> 54:33.200] But like, you've got like eight hours in.
[54:33.200 -> 54:36.280] I'm like, lads, it's eight hours.
[54:37.440 -> 54:41.840] Here's the thing I hate about, and there's a little, you know, for people who might be
[54:41.840 -> 54:48.800] new to Formula One or new to the podcast, there is, or even new to motorsport, there is a sort of friendly rivalry between endurance
[54:48.800 -> 54:54.160] racing fans and F1 fans. There are some both that share both. But my friendly rivalry with
[54:54.160 -> 54:59.400] it is when they go, oh, Formula One is so boring. Oh my God, I can't watch this 90 minute
[54:59.400 -> 55:04.320] Grand Prix race. But next weekend, you want to watch this 24 hour race with me? No, I
[55:04.320 -> 55:10.280] want to go, I want to go cook food and go enjoy life with my girlfriend, and I can't watch a 24 hour
[55:10.280 -> 55:11.280] race?
[55:11.280 -> 55:12.280] Come on.
[55:12.280 -> 55:15.400] And that's the thing I hate, is when endurance racing fans act as if a 24 hour race is the
[55:15.400 -> 55:19.840] best thing in the world, but for some reason a 90 minute Grand Prix race with one or two
[55:19.840 -> 55:22.100] stops in the F1 is not.
[55:22.100 -> 55:27.160] Back to what Christian said, is that it is true, and this is where
[55:27.160 -> 55:31.840] Justin's question could be very interesting. If we did extend the races, and we kept the
[55:31.840 -> 55:37.880] same amount of PUs and gearboxes, would we have an Andrea de Cesaris sort of late 1980s
[55:37.880 -> 55:43.520] F1, where we have like, I think he retired in every race except two that season, for
[55:43.520 -> 55:45.520] various reasons.
[55:49.840 -> 55:50.320] Honestly, that could make for a good one with a one season mechanically.
[55:52.080 -> 55:54.000] I have one idea I would like to see. I've mentioned this before on the podcast,
[55:54.000 -> 56:00.640] but I think we all have this interest in trying to push the drivers
[56:00.640 -> 56:06.640] into new scenarios, into new challenges to see what is going to happen.
[56:06.640 -> 56:10.720] And I think we will never get that what we are seeking, that extreme thing that would
[56:10.720 -> 56:11.720] happen.
[56:11.720 -> 56:14.420] There are limits to what Formula One can contain.
[56:14.420 -> 56:17.600] And right now we have an entire field that are within a second.
[56:17.600 -> 56:19.960] It's so tight everything.
[56:19.960 -> 56:25.100] Instead we should change the whole FIA, gala, annual, whatever thing.
[56:30.200 -> 56:30.600] And then after the season, all drivers should do a 24-hour card race
[56:31.900 -> 56:32.200] with the entire team.
[56:35.800 -> 56:41.300] And during the card race, there should be like the annual celebration where everyone get their medals and make it a racing fest.
[56:41.300 -> 56:42.400] Do it at Wembley.
[56:42.500 -> 56:46.140] Do it inside with a purpose-built racetrack.
[56:46.140 -> 56:49.080] Have maybe Taylor Swift performing,
[56:49.080 -> 56:50.520] The Romance, Alonso.
[56:50.520 -> 56:51.840] The Pussycat Dolls.
[56:51.840 -> 56:52.680] No, not the Pussycat Dolls.
[56:52.680 -> 56:53.920] That's not true anymore.
[56:53.920 -> 56:54.760] No, we can't.
[56:54.760 -> 56:55.680] That's too complicated.
[56:55.680 -> 56:58.400] But we could have Shakira, which would be amazing.
[56:58.400 -> 56:59.240] Yeah.
[56:59.240 -> 57:00.760] And she would tell the truth.
[57:00.760 -> 57:03.600] Exactly, especially if she conveyed everything
[57:03.600 -> 57:04.800] through her hips.
[57:04.800 -> 57:09.740] This has been a great topic, but I want to make sure that we get a few more questions
[57:09.740 -> 57:10.740] in.
[57:10.740 -> 57:18.940] And actually, this next question from Joshua, I think is fundamental to F1's whole talent
[57:18.940 -> 57:19.940] regime.
[57:19.940 -> 57:23.060] How do we bring talented drivers through?
[57:23.060 -> 57:26.160] Are we getting the best that motorsport has to offer?
[57:26.160 -> 57:33.280] So, here's Joshua's question. Thank you for being my F1 friend, he leads his podcast off with.
[57:33.280 -> 57:39.280] And that's a great start, Joshua, because I, growing up, was the only person I knew that
[57:39.280 -> 57:46.920] was into F1. And I only cared about it because my dad gave me a choice of MotoGP, which is stupid because
[57:46.920 -> 57:50.040] the bikes kind of lean over but they don't fall down, which is dumb.
[57:50.040 -> 57:52.600] There's no way it can physically happen.
[57:52.600 -> 57:55.520] So I never fell in love with MotoGP and super bikes.
[57:55.520 -> 58:01.360] And rugby, which as I've stated previously, there's no one knows the rules.
[58:01.360 -> 58:05.280] The referee blows the whistle, everyone looks at him, he invents
[58:05.280 -> 58:09.720] a scenario. He doesn't even know why he blew the whistle. He just got excited because everyone's
[58:09.720 -> 58:14.360] hugging. And then the other choice he gave me was Formula One. So Formula One is what
[58:14.360 -> 58:19.760] I fell in love with. But I didn't have people growing up through all my career until I started
[58:19.760 -> 58:26.240] this podcast, I didn't have people I could chat to to F1 with on a regular basis and then suddenly
[58:26.240 -> 58:32.280] I can chat about F1 all the time. So Joshua, you are also my F1 friend. Thank you and thank
[58:32.280 -> 58:36.800] you for listening. Thank you all for being my F1 friends. I have a silly question. No,
[58:36.800 -> 58:42.880] you don't. I've already said it's a good question. You're making a fool of me, Joshua. I'm 32.
[58:42.880 -> 58:46.720] Congratulations. You've got your life ahead of you. I'm assuming you've just had
[58:46.720 -> 58:51.520] kids, so you know you're going to feel the full impact of just a lack of energy pretty, pretty
[58:51.520 -> 59:00.640] soon. I'm 32, says Joshua. Hamilton is 38 years old. Max is 25 years old. Where is my generation's
[59:00.640 -> 59:10.000] world driver champion? Bottas failed. Ricciardo failed. Perez failed. Do I have to be... Do I have a right to be outraged?
[59:10.000 -> 59:14.000] Love you guys. Thanks again. Keep it up from Joshua. Amazing question.
[59:14.000 -> 59:25.920] Vettel? Vettel? Vettel? Isn't Vettel? Vettel's like a hundred. Vettel's a dad. No, Vettel's... Vettel's a dad. No, Vettel's 35. Yeah, so he doesn't, I still think that would apply. Like
[59:25.920 -> 59:32.480] if you have say, you know, 10 years between those generations, Vettel with his odd four years,
[59:32.480 -> 59:38.720] there is still a big gap there, isn't there? And like in any other championship, like name a top
[59:38.720 -> 59:46.420] series where there's a big 10 year gap, where there's no star that comes through and starts showing
[59:46.420 -> 59:47.420] and dominating.
[59:47.420 -> 59:50.820] And normally, and this is my big concern with Formula One, is when you get that kind of
[59:50.820 -> 59:55.820] gap and when you stop having people coming through to challenge these guys at the very
[59:55.820 -> 01:00:00.660] top, sometimes when you have people at the top and they dominate for a long, long time,
[01:00:00.660 -> 01:00:08.480] it just means your sport isn't that healthy in terms of new talent. And I've often worried about this with Formula
[01:00:08.480 -> 01:00:08.720] One.
[01:00:09.160 -> 01:00:12.960] Well, look, apart from you've got Verstappen, Hamilton,
[01:00:12.960 -> 01:00:17.480] Vettel, now you take out Nico Rosberg in there. Nico earned
[01:00:17.480 -> 01:00:19.560] that title, but I'm just saying you take him out because we want
[01:00:19.560 -> 01:00:23.120] this theory to work. But generally, we've only had three
[01:00:23.120 -> 01:00:25.880] world champions since 2010, apart from Rosberg.
[01:00:25.880 -> 01:00:32.240] Four world champions. So that's made a big difference. And look, I feel sorry for Josh
[01:00:32.240 -> 01:00:38.480] in this situation. I'm not complaining, because honestly, Max is pretty much my age, and Hamilton
[01:00:38.480 -> 01:00:42.900] was the driver I looked up to pretty much growing up my entire life as a young kid.
[01:00:42.900 -> 01:00:47.760] And so I've won in this situation, and I do feel sorry for Josh because I don't know what he's talking about right now
[01:00:47.760 -> 01:00:49.760] because I wouldn't have experienced that. I feel privileged.
[01:00:51.200 -> 01:00:53.600] I think there was something about the time in Formula 1.
[01:00:55.000 -> 01:00:58.280] Around the time Hamilton was introduced,
[01:00:58.280 -> 01:01:00.840] that end zeros
[01:01:01.320 -> 01:01:06.120] where it still played a way too role how much money you had, if you had
[01:01:06.440 -> 01:01:10.840] been nurtured by a team, and it was still like the Bernie era. But they came to
[01:01:10.840 -> 01:01:16.400] realize that there will not be a new Hamilton every year, that no teams have a
[01:01:16.400 -> 01:01:20.440] new Hamilton. So we need to do something ourself. And I think it was around that
[01:01:20.440 -> 01:01:25.880] time when they really started focusing on it for real to get the new young talent into the sport.
[01:01:26.120 -> 01:01:34.200] Thank you very much, Wes. Yeah, Wes says, like tennis. And tennis, I think is a reasonable example because, okay, so
[01:01:34.240 -> 01:01:40.840] you know, as a working class kid, what do you have access to? Well, I had access to team sports, I had access to
[01:01:40.840 -> 01:01:45.840] football was cheap. Cricket was relatively cheap, because most of the local teams would have a kit bag
[01:01:45.840 -> 01:01:46.920] and you could borrow it.
[01:01:46.920 -> 01:01:49.120] As long as you could buy your own box
[01:01:49.120 -> 01:01:51.200] for hygiene reasons, then you're okay.
[01:01:51.200 -> 01:01:52.640] Football, you just needed a football
[01:01:52.640 -> 01:01:54.200] and you can go have a kick around.
[01:01:54.200 -> 01:01:56.360] Tennis, you had to hire the court
[01:01:56.360 -> 01:01:57.520] and you needed an equipment.
[01:01:57.520 -> 01:02:00.320] So any sport where you need equipment,
[01:02:00.320 -> 01:02:01.160] you don't realise,
[01:02:01.160 -> 01:02:02.360] I think a lot of people don't realise
[01:02:02.360 -> 01:02:05.280] how quickly down the ladder people kind of go,
[01:02:05.280 -> 01:02:11.680] ah, well, I won't do that sport because I need to go and buy a hockey stick or I need to go and buy a tennis racket,
[01:02:11.680 -> 01:02:17.560] I need to buy padding, I need to buy these things. So the more accessible the sport, I think the more the sport will suffer from
[01:02:18.200 -> 01:02:24.360] limited talent and court time in tennis, I think is one of those for grass roots.
[01:02:24.480 -> 01:02:27.720] So yeah, it does make you kind of worry.
[01:02:27.720 -> 01:02:31.960] And F1, though, I think one of the factors that played into this particular generational
[01:02:31.960 -> 01:02:35.600] gap is drivers extending their careers suddenly.
[01:02:35.600 -> 01:02:41.720] So because we had superstar drivers suddenly kind of come onto the scene, F1, I think,
[01:02:41.720 -> 01:02:46.400] wanted to keep the likes of Kimi Raikikkönen going. You know, they wanted Fernando
[01:02:46.400 -> 01:02:53.360] Alonso in the sport. I bet there are a part of the negotiations with Lewis Hamilton staying in the
[01:02:53.360 -> 01:03:00.240] sport is from the FIA themselves. Like I bet you Liberty Media are trying to make sure Lewis
[01:03:00.240 -> 01:03:05.680] Hamilton will stay in the sport at 38. And he's now talking about being in Formula
[01:03:05.680 -> 01:03:10.120] One again for a good while. So that means he's probably going to be a driver in his
[01:03:10.120 -> 01:03:17.760] 40s in Formula One. If this was a sport less like tennis and more like soccer, it would
[01:03:17.760 -> 01:03:22.200] be unlikely that Fernando Alonso is there at 40, that Lewis Hamilton there is there
[01:03:22.200 -> 01:03:25.240] at 41. I think that might be part of the problem, Jono.
[01:03:25.240 -> 01:03:32.320] Look, potentially, definitely potentially. Josh's question is a difficult one. I don't
[01:03:32.320 -> 01:03:33.320] know, do we want to...
[01:03:33.320 -> 01:03:34.320] That's a good comment.
[01:03:34.320 -> 01:03:39.200] It's a good comment. Do we turn back the tape? Do we wind back the clock and sort of be like,
[01:03:39.200 -> 01:03:43.280] let's give birth and let's raise Sergio Perez and everyone, let's get around him. He had
[01:03:43.280 -> 01:03:44.440] a lot of money around him.
[01:03:44.440 -> 01:03:45.680] He did. Let's raise Sergio Perez and everyone, let's get around him. He had a lot of money around him.
[01:03:46.080 -> 01:03:49.840] He did. So look, Josh has said, do I have a right to be outraged?
[01:03:50.560 -> 01:03:51.840] Yes, you do.
[01:03:51.840 -> 01:03:53.360] I feel sorry for you.
[01:03:53.360 -> 01:03:56.000] And I'd like to send my condolences.
[01:03:56.000 -> 01:04:01.280] There's also a solution, which is, you know, expand your range of motorsports.
[01:04:01.280 -> 01:04:06.080] So this is why I feel like there should be like a Formula 1.5 as well.
[01:04:06.080 -> 01:04:10.320] Because yeah, you can say to people, well, go and watch Rallycross and you can get involved and
[01:04:11.760 -> 01:04:16.400] appreciate those players and be a fan of those drivers. But I do feel like if there was a second
[01:04:16.400 -> 01:04:33.960] tier of Formula 1, you could find people who are doing really well in a certain space and you could support them in the same way that you can support Coventry City or Nesved FC for you, Christian, or Cairns. I
[01:04:33.960 -> 01:04:36.960] don't know how good the Cairns football team is, but you know, you could find support all
[01:04:36.960 -> 01:04:43.320] the way down and not feel lost in this field of a very narrow field of 20 drivers where
[01:04:43.320 -> 01:04:46.320] they're all, each driver in a way is a little mini
[01:04:46.320 -> 01:04:51.800] franchise and it's hard to let them go. Every time they dump one of the top five drivers
[01:04:51.800 -> 01:04:56.440] out of Formula One or one of them retires, so Kimi Räikkönen retiring even. Kimi Räikkönen
[01:04:56.440 -> 01:05:02.800] who really didn't set the world on fire when you talk about, is it S-Class you're going
[01:05:02.800 -> 01:05:07.520] for Christian? He wasn't S-Class, but even when he left Formula 1,
[01:05:07.520 -> 01:05:09.440] I think they would have seen that as a big hit.
[01:05:09.440 -> 01:05:10.960] And who did they get in instead?
[01:05:10.960 -> 01:05:12.960] Who was the replacement for that?
[01:05:12.960 -> 01:05:13.840] Because they're little mini franchises.
[01:05:13.840 -> 01:05:18.640] I actually think Kimi Räikkönen was potentially going to be S-Class
[01:05:19.760 -> 01:05:23.520] in his prime McLaren years, but something went wrong.
[01:05:23.520 -> 01:05:25.440] He had the potential to become S-Class,
[01:05:25.440 -> 01:05:31.680] I would say. And also, the Mercedes top line is called S-Class. Maybe it's from...
[01:05:31.680 -> 01:05:36.160] No, the chat room has said that perhaps you have picked this up from Gran Turismo,
[01:05:36.160 -> 01:05:37.920] where S-Class is the top class.
[01:05:37.920 -> 01:05:39.760] That is true. That is very true.
[01:05:39.760 -> 01:05:43.760] All right. Let's get one more. One more listener question. We've got time. We've got time,
[01:05:43.760 -> 01:05:51.440] haven't we? Here we go. All right. So this is from Ryan. Hi, Map Crew. That's us. Do you think that if by the end of the season,
[01:05:51.440 -> 01:05:56.640] let's say Abu Dhabi, Stroll hasn't performed as he should with the car underneath him,
[01:05:57.360 -> 01:06:02.080] missing a race wouldn't change his position in the standings, maybe he'll become mysteriously,
[01:06:02.080 -> 01:06:06.280] he has an illness and Drogovic gets to step in to see what he can do. Can
[01:06:06.280 -> 01:06:09.720] Lawrence Stroll be cutthroat enough with his own son and
[01:06:09.720 -> 01:06:11.840] drop him? That's the main question. Thank you, Ryan.
[01:06:12.760 -> 01:06:16.040] Jono, can Lawrence Stroll be cutthroat enough with his own
[01:06:16.040 -> 01:06:16.880] son and drop him?
[01:06:17.320 -> 01:06:23.360] No, it won't happen. And Stroll has missed early parts of this
[01:06:23.360 -> 01:06:26.560] season with testing, he had an injury, he's
[01:06:26.560 -> 01:06:29.280] still getting into, still recovering from it all.
[01:06:29.280 -> 01:06:34.000] I think we're in an era of F1 where we have to give more leeway to drivers who miss the
[01:06:34.000 -> 01:06:36.760] early preparations or some form of testing time.
[01:06:36.760 -> 01:06:39.960] Yes, people can go, well, what about Nick DeVries last year, jumped into a Williams
[01:06:39.960 -> 01:06:41.720] and performed really well.
[01:06:41.720 -> 01:06:43.480] Good argument, fair enough.
[01:06:43.480 -> 01:06:47.840] I think this year, Stroll, who allegedly has, you know, world
[01:06:47.840 -> 01:06:50.160] championship potential, according to Alonso, didn't get
[01:06:50.160 -> 01:06:54.880] the right sort of potential, like preparations for the year.
[01:06:54.880 -> 01:06:57.680] So I think we do need to give him a bit more time. But at the
[01:06:57.680 -> 01:07:00.560] end of the day, I don't think he's as bad as we think he is.
[01:07:00.560 -> 01:07:04.640] And I think he's proven in the past he can be quicker. At the
[01:07:04.640 -> 01:07:05.040] end of the day,
[01:07:05.040 -> 01:07:10.080] Lawrence Stroll has got a business on his hands here, and he's invested hundreds of million
[01:07:10.080 -> 01:07:15.120] dollars into not just the Formula One team, but into Aston Martin as a brand. And he has to
[01:07:15.120 -> 01:07:19.520] consider, well, if we're not finishing higher up in the standings, how am I going to make my money
[01:07:19.520 -> 01:07:24.320] back? And does that mean I need to get rid of my son to score more points, to score more prize
[01:07:24.320 -> 01:07:26.360] money, to then earn more money?
[01:07:26.360 -> 01:07:29.920] Because he's got, and if people look into the facts and what Lawrence Stroll has invested
[01:07:29.920 -> 01:07:33.320] in this, he's got a big decision on his hands here.
[01:07:33.320 -> 01:07:40.020] Nepotism or go with a driver who could challenge Alonso and actually score a lot of points
[01:07:40.020 -> 01:07:42.000] and wins and potentially things like that.
[01:07:42.000 -> 01:07:45.360] No offense to Lance, who I think is a quality driver himself.
[01:07:45.360 -> 01:07:46.360] I agree.
[01:07:46.360 -> 01:07:50.080] I think Lance is a, he's not S tier.
[01:07:50.080 -> 01:07:51.580] He's not a five.
[01:07:51.580 -> 01:07:52.580] He's maybe a 4.5, 4.7.
[01:07:52.580 -> 01:07:53.580] What?
[01:07:53.580 -> 01:07:54.580] Oh, Christian, Christian, behave, please.
[01:07:54.580 -> 01:07:55.580] No, Christian.
[01:07:55.580 -> 01:07:56.580] People are listening to this, Christian.
[01:07:56.580 -> 01:07:57.580] They will hear this.
[01:07:57.580 -> 01:07:58.580] You're talking out loud.
[01:07:58.580 -> 01:07:59.580] Why didn't you say that from the get go?
[01:07:59.580 -> 01:08:00.580] I'll give him a three at best.
[01:08:00.580 -> 01:08:01.580] I'm not sure Laurence Strohl is having, I'm not sure everything is going to be the same.
[01:08:01.580 -> 01:08:02.580] I'm not sure.
[01:08:02.580 -> 01:08:03.580] I'm not sure.
[01:08:03.580 -> 01:08:04.580] I'm not sure.
[01:08:04.580 -> 01:08:06.520] I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. They will hear this. You're talking out loud. Why didn't you say that from the get-go? I'll give him a three at best.
[01:08:06.520 -> 01:08:13.160] I'm not sure Lawrence Stroll is having, I'm not sure everything is just shiny times, everyone's
[01:08:13.160 -> 01:08:19.720] happy at Aston Martin these days because the car business is not going very well.
[01:08:19.720 -> 01:08:22.880] And there is some new investor stuff going on.
[01:08:22.880 -> 01:08:26.000] He's got the new facilities being built.
[01:08:26.000 -> 01:08:34.080] And I think when you have a business at that level and you're involved in expansion and
[01:08:34.080 -> 01:08:36.400] stuff like that, things are changing.
[01:08:36.400 -> 01:08:40.720] You can't just keep your son in the seat if he doesn't perform.
[01:08:40.720 -> 01:08:47.880] I mean, if you want your mechanics to give you 110% and you have a 90% driver, I think
[01:08:47.880 -> 01:08:51.860] the mechanics are going to suffer from that eventually.
[01:08:51.860 -> 01:08:57.180] But also, I don't think we should forget that there's a reason Laurence Stroll is wearing
[01:08:57.180 -> 01:09:01.860] his trousers just below his armpits, and they are light blue.
[01:09:01.860 -> 01:09:04.060] The reason is he's a businessman.
[01:09:04.060 -> 01:09:05.840] Okay. What's this? I didn't know businessmen did that. I didn't know. and they are light blue. The reason is he's a businessman.
[01:09:08.160 -> 01:09:13.600] I didn't know businessmen did that. I didn't know. Eventually, I think he will make the decision that is best for the firm,
[01:09:14.160 -> 01:09:20.080] but he could still save himself Lance Stroll, if you ask me. I think he has 2023 to go.
[01:09:20.960 -> 01:09:26.400] Look, along with this, the question from Ryan has been, well, could we put in Felipe Drogovic
[01:09:26.400 -> 01:09:27.400] to do a better job?
[01:09:27.400 -> 01:09:32.720] No offense to Felipe Drogovic, but now you're gonna put a driver with less prep, who's had
[01:09:32.720 -> 01:09:37.360] not the best junior career, yeah, people say, oh, he won Formula 2, and that's amazing.
[01:09:37.360 -> 01:09:41.840] I'm sorry, but anybody who takes more than one year to win Formula 2, to me, is not a
[01:09:41.840 -> 01:09:43.920] driver that's gonna challenge Fernando Alonso.
[01:09:43.920 -> 01:09:47.600] You need to be winning that in your first year, regardless of the car or team you're
[01:09:47.600 -> 01:09:48.600] in.
[01:09:48.600 -> 01:09:49.600] And that's what drivers have proved in the past.
[01:09:49.600 -> 01:09:52.080] I don't think that's the solution either.
[01:09:52.080 -> 01:09:56.340] I think the solution is stability and it's to keep with Lance, keep with some experience
[01:09:56.340 -> 01:09:58.720] there and give him more time to get used to the car.
[01:09:58.720 -> 01:10:02.560] Lance Stroll compared to his teammate right now, he's behind.
[01:10:02.560 -> 01:10:03.560] Obviously we know that.
[01:10:03.560 -> 01:10:05.780] Like there's no world in which Lance
[01:10:05.780 -> 01:10:11.700] Stroll is going to catch up and be as good as Fernando Alonso. If that happens, they've
[01:10:11.700 -> 01:10:17.420] knifed Alonso's tyres or they've pulled his fuel hose. However, in his defence, looking
[01:10:17.420 -> 01:10:25.040] at the general state of teammate relationships, there are a lot of drivers that are behind their teammates
[01:10:25.040 -> 01:10:31.840] at the moment. So, to a lesser extent, Sainz has been over the last two years a good step
[01:10:31.840 -> 01:10:39.400] behind Leclerc. Russell is probably a half a step behind Lewis Hamilton. Perez is a big
[01:10:39.400 -> 01:10:43.720] chunk behind. So that's actually at the moment, that's the comparable comparison. You could
[01:10:43.720 -> 01:10:48.800] say, well, is Lance Stroll any further behind Alonso than Perez is behind Max Verstappen?
[01:10:48.800 -> 01:10:52.160] So if you want to be generous, let's look at it that way.
[01:10:52.160 -> 01:10:55.840] De Vries, let's look at Sargent.
[01:10:55.840 -> 01:11:00.880] So there's a lot of teams where that is happening at the moment.
[01:11:00.880 -> 01:11:07.440] I think the reasonable thing to say is you have to expect your sister car to be not more
[01:11:07.440 -> 01:11:11.160] than a couple of positions behind your leading car.
[01:11:11.160 -> 01:11:14.120] And that is with no names mentioned or anything.
[01:11:14.120 -> 01:11:20.880] So if your leading car is position four, your sister car is position six, seven.
[01:11:20.880 -> 01:11:22.820] It's not 12 or 11.
[01:11:22.820 -> 01:11:26.640] And if that keeps on going, then you start asking questions.
[01:11:26.640 -> 01:11:31.840] Journalists start asking Lance during the press every time, pressure on the team,
[01:11:31.840 -> 01:11:36.000] this will set on people's shoulders. It's a bad snowball.
[01:11:36.000 -> 01:11:42.480] It is. So I try to be positive here on Miss Apex podcast. I try not to be the guy
[01:11:42.480 -> 01:11:43.040] Really try so hard.
[01:11:43.040 -> 01:11:46.280] Sniping from the sidelines. And look, it is when a
[01:11:46.280 -> 01:11:50.480] team's doing really well, there's less to say about a team. When a driver's doing well,
[01:11:50.480 -> 01:11:54.600] there's less to say about a driver. Naturally, the talking points on content always revolve
[01:11:54.600 -> 01:12:01.320] more to when drivers are struggling or teams are struggling. So having spent a fair amount
[01:12:01.320 -> 01:12:05.960] of time talking to people from Aston Martin, for some reason, people from Aston Martin have listened to this show. And I have had people from Aston Martin. Like for some reason, people from Aston Martin
[01:12:05.960 -> 01:12:06.920] have listened to the show.
[01:12:06.920 -> 01:12:08.640] And I have had people from Aston Martin saying,
[01:12:08.640 -> 01:12:12.200] I do like your show, you're way too harsh on Lance Stroll,
[01:12:12.200 -> 01:12:13.800] you're way too harsh on the team.
[01:12:13.800 -> 01:12:16.040] And I respect that and I've had good back and forths.
[01:12:16.040 -> 01:12:17.560] And then I was a little nervous
[01:12:17.560 -> 01:12:18.840] when I went to a recent event
[01:12:18.840 -> 01:12:21.000] and there's eight people from Aston Martin there.
[01:12:21.000 -> 01:12:22.760] I'm going, oh no, is that one of the people
[01:12:22.760 -> 01:12:24.680] who's told me off over DMs?
[01:12:24.680 -> 01:12:29.320] But look, the feeling I get at Aston Martin is the staff are happy. Like people
[01:12:29.320 -> 01:12:36.040] are happy under Laurence Stroll. And that team is running, has a good vibe. Everyone
[01:12:36.040 -> 01:12:41.720] there is like feeling it. They feel looked after and they've got team spirit. So any
[01:12:41.720 -> 01:12:45.080] kind of implication that it's, you know, some Lance Lawrence Stroll
[01:12:45.080 -> 01:12:50.320] conglomerate and he's a dictator and he's running it all for his own personal gain doesn't
[01:12:50.320 -> 01:12:55.960] seem to have filtered down to the team. The team morale looks like it's absolutely fantastic.
[01:12:55.960 -> 01:13:02.640] However, I don't buy that Lawrence Stroll is there for any other real reason other than
[01:13:02.640 -> 01:13:05.240] promoting his son and getting his son going forward.
[01:13:05.240 -> 01:13:07.080] He obviously has to present that,
[01:13:07.080 -> 01:13:09.980] he has to present that to his shareholders
[01:13:09.980 -> 01:13:12.640] and the team to keep everyone motivated.
[01:13:12.640 -> 01:13:15.080] But if Lance Stroll tomorrow just goes,
[01:13:15.080 -> 01:13:18.240] I'm just, I'm like, I'm fully bored, dad.
[01:13:18.240 -> 01:13:21.040] You've been holding me back from my real ambition,
[01:13:21.040 -> 01:13:23.200] which is to be a hedge fund manager,
[01:13:23.200 -> 01:13:24.840] and I just don't wanna do this anymore.
[01:13:24.840 -> 01:13:30.940] I wanna get back to just in financial investments. He quits F1. I think there is
[01:13:30.940 -> 01:13:35.920] a tactical withdrawal. Obviously, there'll be some face saving. But that's my overall
[01:13:35.920 -> 01:13:40.120] impression. Like, tell me if I'm wrong. Someone with inside knowledge, tell me if I'm wrong.
[01:13:40.120 -> 01:13:46.160] But the whole Lawrence Stroll project in F1 is about Lawrence Stroll, whatever they might want to tell you.
[01:13:46.160 -> 01:13:47.000] You're both trying to get in.
[01:13:47.000 -> 01:13:48.840] Okay, Jono, then Christian.
[01:13:48.840 -> 01:13:50.160] Okay, first of all,
[01:13:51.440 -> 01:13:53.320] Lawrence Stroll is a proven billionaire.
[01:13:53.320 -> 01:13:54.880] He's done his achievements.
[01:13:54.880 -> 01:13:56.960] Think of him as the equivalent when it comes to money,
[01:13:56.960 -> 01:13:59.040] as somebody who's won his world championships
[01:13:59.040 -> 01:14:02.080] and he's Kimi Räikkönen and he's waiting to retire.
[01:14:02.080 -> 01:14:03.880] You know, basically that was Kimi's last 10 years
[01:14:03.880 -> 01:14:08.720] of his F1 career in a sense, was just waiting to just get over and done with. That was Laurence Stroh. Now, what can you do to
[01:14:08.720 -> 01:14:13.520] motivate yourself? Own an F1 team, which barely anyone in history, I think, has made any money
[01:14:13.520 -> 01:14:19.760] off. It's almost a difficult task. Now, what he's done is he's bought Racing Point, saved them,
[01:14:20.480 -> 01:14:25.040] rebranded it into Aston Martin, a company in Aston Martin, which was already sort of
[01:14:25.040 -> 01:14:30.280] failing and had a lot of sort of money that was going down the drain and is still struggling.
[01:14:30.280 -> 01:14:34.800] He's got their branding, invested in the company, got their branding on the cars, now he's got
[01:14:34.800 -> 01:14:36.720] a potential race winner.
[01:14:36.720 -> 01:14:40.480] And what you're talking about now is not only does the car brand benefit from this, but
[01:14:40.480 -> 01:14:41.840] so does Lawrence Stroll.
[01:14:41.840 -> 01:14:44.900] He makes a lot of money out of this if both succeed.
[01:14:44.900 -> 01:14:49.060] So the bonus to this is his son is in F1 and he gives him a chance to race.
[01:14:49.060 -> 01:14:51.380] I don't think that's the main sort of...
[01:14:51.380 -> 01:14:52.380] I don't agree.
[01:14:52.380 -> 01:14:53.380] ...his main agenda.
[01:14:53.380 -> 01:14:56.780] Respectfully, that's great perspective, I don't agree.
[01:14:56.780 -> 01:14:57.780] Christian?
[01:14:57.780 -> 01:15:03.580] Now you're saying the thing about the AM team actually listening to this, I want to retract
[01:15:03.580 -> 01:15:05.680] some of the things I said.
[01:15:08.000 -> 01:15:12.720] I just want to prove a point. I'm not saying Mike Crack is listening to this. I'm saying some of the guys in the garage.
[01:15:14.960 -> 01:15:20.560] I think Laurence Stroll is a businessman in the Formula 1 paddock more than he's a dad.
[01:15:21.120 -> 01:15:28.160] That is all I'm saying. I don't think he's a naive or anything. I think he's
[01:15:28.160 -> 01:15:33.200] proved to us from the one point he's been in there for ages and he's not just there
[01:15:33.200 -> 01:15:37.480] for the money. He likes what he's doing and he has a grand plan. And maybe his son is
[01:15:37.480 -> 01:15:43.320] part of the plan, but I don't see his son being the reason the plan doesn't succeed.
[01:15:43.320 -> 01:15:48.240] Oh, okay. So maybe the truth lies somewhere in between.
[01:15:48.240 -> 01:15:53.880] Maybe his main motivation was fueled by Lance Stroll being there, but in the process, he
[01:15:53.880 -> 01:15:59.880] found out that his real son was the company that he was founding all along, like a Hollywood
[01:15:59.880 -> 01:16:00.880] movie.
[01:16:00.880 -> 01:16:01.880] Yeah.
[01:16:01.880 -> 01:16:02.880] I cried.
[01:16:02.880 -> 01:16:03.880] I don't know.
[01:16:03.880 -> 01:16:04.880] I don't know.
[01:16:04.880 -> 01:16:11.000] Jono? Yeah, but I don't like... I cry. I don't know. Wait, Spanis, my thing is, why would you hire Sebastian Vettel and Fernando Alonso to challenge your son?
[01:16:11.000 -> 01:16:15.000] If you were going to do anything, you would hire a person in a second car who's complete crap.
[01:16:15.000 -> 01:16:29.160] It's the correct point to a point. So like, if you want to drive Aston Martin forward, you can't then just go, okay, this may be slightly unfair, but let's say, let's pick Giovinazzi as a second driver and out and
[01:16:29.160 -> 01:16:31.040] out say Lance Stroll is your first driver.
[01:16:31.040 -> 01:16:34.600] Let's hope Lance beats him and looks like he's good.
[01:16:34.600 -> 01:16:38.880] But at the moment, if they do that, and I think Giovinazzi, I think that's reasonably
[01:16:38.880 -> 01:16:39.880] fair.
[01:16:39.880 -> 01:16:40.880] I think if they-
[01:16:40.880 -> 01:16:42.920] Well, Luca Badawer would be a worse example if you want to use him.
[01:16:42.920 -> 01:16:44.920] Luca Badawer is 48 years old.
[01:16:44.920 -> 01:16:48.640] Okay. But I don't know. let's think of like a pro...
[01:16:48.640 -> 01:16:50.960] Gibonacci just won the Le Mans, so I mean he's...
[01:16:50.960 -> 01:16:54.880] No, I know, that's why that came to my mind and went out as immediately a bad example.
[01:16:54.880 -> 01:16:59.120] But let's say you pick a driver who you know you're not going to give exactly the same car to,
[01:16:59.120 -> 01:17:04.800] who's an out-and-out number two driver, who will still make your son look good.
[01:17:04.800 -> 01:17:05.000] So a driver who is... make your son look good.
[01:17:05.000 -> 01:17:06.480] So a driver who is...
[01:17:06.480 -> 01:17:09.080] There are drivers out there who just want a job,
[01:17:09.080 -> 01:17:11.180] who want to be in F1, who are happy to pick up results
[01:17:11.180 -> 01:17:13.760] and know and understand their role.
[01:17:13.760 -> 01:17:16.880] Oh mate, why have you got to do that to me?
[01:17:16.880 -> 01:17:18.320] Why have you got to do that to me?
[01:17:18.320 -> 01:17:20.080] It's the truth, but yeah.
[01:17:20.080 -> 01:17:24.560] Okay, so, but let's say you have Lance Stroll there
[01:17:24.560 -> 01:17:27.120] and you, this season, instead of Alonso,
[01:17:27.120 -> 01:17:29.760] you've given it to Barrichello, yeah?
[01:17:29.760 -> 01:17:33.160] Yeah, or Badoa, an age-appropriate Barrichello,
[01:17:33.160 -> 01:17:36.000] and you don't give them the upgrades first.
[01:17:36.000 -> 01:17:39.560] Aston Martin now, I haven't done the maths,
[01:17:39.560 -> 01:17:41.820] but maybe they look like the fifth best team.
[01:17:41.820 -> 01:17:44.600] Maybe they look like the sixth best team,
[01:17:44.600 -> 01:17:45.040] because Stroll
[01:17:45.040 -> 01:17:49.580] has been nowhere, injury aside, but even in recent races he's been nowhere. Lance Stroll's
[01:17:49.580 -> 01:17:55.900] your lead driver this season. Aston Martin look like they've done nothing this season.
[01:17:55.900 -> 01:18:00.080] So you can't do that right now because Lance Stroll clearly isn't there. So to drive the
[01:18:00.080 -> 01:18:05.360] project forward, you do a bait and switch. You bring your Vettel in, you bring your Alonso
[01:18:05.360 -> 01:18:12.120] in, and Alonso gets old and retires at some point or falls out with the team. I can't
[01:18:12.120 -> 01:18:16.980] imagine it's going to be massively difficult to find an excuse to get rid of Alonso if
[01:18:16.980 -> 01:18:22.240] you think Stroll is at that point. And then you bring in a young rookie, don't give him
[01:18:22.240 -> 01:18:29.280] the upgrades, lead Lance Stroll forward. And also, I think one of the main points that gets lost in all of this is Laurence Stroll
[01:18:29.280 -> 01:18:37.680] is worth $6 billion euro space points. I don't think many people grasp how much money that
[01:18:37.680 -> 01:18:45.000] is. That's enough money to raise a fund to go and buy Formula One.
[01:18:45.160 -> 01:18:48.160] That's enough money to put forward for a serious offer
[01:18:48.160 -> 01:18:51.800] to say to other networks and business owners
[01:18:51.800 -> 01:18:54.800] and financial people, let's just buy F1.
[01:18:54.800 -> 01:18:56.160] So he could buy F1.
[01:18:56.160 -> 01:18:57.200] He bought Aston Martin,
[01:18:57.200 -> 01:19:01.160] but he could probably buy Mercedes, F1 team.
[01:19:01.160 -> 01:19:02.000] If Mercedes-
[01:19:02.000 -> 01:19:02.840] He should buy this podcast.
[01:19:02.840 -> 01:19:06.320] He should buy this podcast for just one of this podcast for one of those six billions.
[01:19:06.320 -> 01:19:12.120] And I will sell. And if you point out the hypocrisy... And you will have five left.
[01:19:12.120 -> 01:19:15.400] I mean, what's the deal? Yeah, but you know, there was a point where,
[01:19:15.400 -> 01:19:21.320] you know, perhaps Mercedes were fighting for their backing from Daimler. Maybe there could
[01:19:21.320 -> 01:19:26.960] have been a point where Stroll could have gone and bought Mercedes instead, but I don't think it was available.
[01:19:26.960 -> 01:19:31.040] He has a vast, vast personal fund.
[01:19:31.040 -> 01:19:37.020] Along with that, Mercedes and Toto Wolf, well Toto Wolf I should backtrack, said Mercedes
[01:19:37.020 -> 01:19:42.920] have proven to have increased their marketability and sort of, I don't want to say profits,
[01:19:42.920 -> 01:19:43.920] you know what I mean?
[01:19:43.920 -> 01:19:45.300] No, no, no, with the cost cap,
[01:19:45.300 -> 01:19:46.600] they now make a profit off the team, yeah.
[01:19:46.600 -> 01:19:47.680] They now make a profit,
[01:19:47.680 -> 01:19:50.200] and it's increased their sort of visibility
[01:19:50.200 -> 01:19:52.120] within the car, the motoring space,
[01:19:52.120 -> 01:19:53.680] and the motor sports space too.
[01:19:53.680 -> 01:19:56.360] So it does make a difference, success in Formula One.
[01:19:56.360 -> 01:19:58.520] And that's what Laurence Stroll's trying to chase.
[01:19:58.520 -> 01:20:00.480] He owns, what, a quarter of Aston Martin,
[01:20:00.480 -> 01:20:01.940] the actual car brand,
[01:20:01.940 -> 01:20:04.160] let alone he owns the F1 team as well,
[01:20:04.160 -> 01:20:05.280] which he's got there backing.
[01:20:05.920 -> 01:20:10.400] I think he's a genius and I think it has nothing to do with his son. And I think his son is there
[01:20:10.400 -> 01:20:16.240] as an added bonus going, well, look, dad, I'm running a great company and can I come and work
[01:20:16.240 -> 01:20:20.640] for you one day? Is that all right? Bang, go, have a seat. That's the way it's working at the moment.
[01:20:20.640 -> 01:20:25.360] Okay. But let's say Lance Stroll has overcome an injury, he's hanging in there,
[01:20:26.400 -> 01:20:31.600] but we're assuming that, okay, this is the bottom of where he's doing, he's struggling,
[01:20:31.600 -> 01:20:36.480] but he could do worse. So yeah, he looked good last season against Vettel, who is someone that
[01:20:36.480 -> 01:20:41.120] I've never particularly rated, and people will get upset at this, but when the Red Bull thing
[01:20:41.120 -> 01:20:45.600] was happening, I thought, this is Schumacher all over again.
[01:20:45.600 -> 01:20:51.520] He is going to get found out. And I feel like he did kind of get found out and find his level.
[01:20:51.520 -> 01:20:55.680] Right. So putting Vettel at the end of his career, at the end of his motivation,
[01:20:56.240 -> 01:21:01.280] in with Lance Stroll was genius. I understood that. I wonder whether they underestimated just
[01:21:01.280 -> 01:21:07.360] how good Fernando Alonso is. But that was a very easy, almost like a
[01:21:08.720 -> 01:21:12.960] mummy lion killing a baby deer, but not quite, and then letting the cub
[01:21:13.600 -> 01:21:20.240] chase it. But this season it's looking bad and it could get worse. So at the moment, he's not
[01:21:20.240 -> 01:21:26.800] crashing into people every five minutes. He's not hitting a wall every five minutes. He's going about his business on a race weekend
[01:21:26.800 -> 01:21:28.340] and looking slow.
[01:21:28.340 -> 01:21:31.080] That could get better, like Laurence Stroll was saying,
[01:21:31.080 -> 01:21:32.880] oh, he's going to be alongside Fernando Alonso.
[01:21:32.880 -> 01:21:34.720] No, he's not, unless something weird happens.
[01:21:34.720 -> 01:21:36.040] It could get worse.
[01:21:36.040 -> 01:21:38.360] He could start racing significantly worse.
[01:21:38.360 -> 01:21:40.360] He could start having, you know, DNFs.
[01:21:40.360 -> 01:21:42.200] This is not a good position he's in.
[01:21:42.200 -> 01:21:46.000] I don't want to underplay how badly Lance Stroll is doing
[01:21:46.000 -> 01:21:51.760] at the moment compared to Fernando Alonso. Even though I started off all positive, my true feelings
[01:21:51.760 -> 01:22:00.000] came out in the end. Can't hide the truth. He's still eighth, he's 80 points behind Alonso in
[01:22:00.000 -> 01:22:04.320] the championship, which is three races. If you think about it, if Lance Stroll won the next three
[01:22:04.320 -> 01:22:07.840] races, almost going into the summer break, I think three races from now
[01:22:07.840 -> 01:22:12.960] is Belgium, or I don't know what it is, is it right on the summer break? That's embarrassing,
[01:22:12.960 -> 01:22:17.600] when you're that far behind, it's not even midway through the season. Yeah, look, Alonso's
[01:22:17.600 -> 01:22:21.280] white floor with him, and what makes it worse is Alonso's not even in his prime, he's a
[01:22:21.280 -> 01:22:26.400] 42, 41 year old going on 42 next month. How dare you? That is the prime.
[01:22:26.400 -> 01:22:30.840] He could, he could be 50 times quicker. I think Fernando Alonso, if he was,
[01:22:30.840 -> 01:22:35.320] if this was 10 years ago, this is 2010 Alonso, the deadliest driver pairing
[01:22:35.320 -> 01:22:39.040] combo we had all time, Alonso in a Ferrari 2010. If this was that Alonso,
[01:22:39.160 -> 01:22:43.400] it would be even worse. We could have seen a potential Aston Martin victory by now.
[01:22:43.520 -> 01:22:49.040] And that would have made things a lot worse for Lance Stroll. So Lawrence, as a big decision to make, what's going to happen for the
[01:22:49.040 -> 01:22:52.960] next few years? I think you'll just stick with Lance Stroll, if I'm honest. I don't think there's
[01:22:52.960 -> 01:23:00.640] too much doubt in that. One short point, and it's a completely different topic, but I think if they
[01:23:00.640 -> 01:23:08.600] make the cars lighter, let's say 200 kilos off, we're not going to see 41-year-old drivers in Formula 1 in the future.
[01:23:08.700 -> 01:23:10.000] Maybe, maybe.
[01:23:10.100 -> 01:23:12.900] And look, as much as I love Fernando Alonso,
[01:23:13.000 -> 01:23:15.600] and as much as I love Lewis Hamilton being in the sport,
[01:23:16.000 -> 01:23:20.300] other sports don't have people my age at the top of their game
[01:23:20.600 -> 01:23:22.100] still being able to compete.
[01:23:22.200 -> 01:23:24.500] Like, Jono, you don't know this yet,
[01:23:24.700 -> 01:23:28.340] but Christian knows your body doesn't get any better
[01:23:28.340 -> 01:23:31.760] past 35, there is a distinct pinnacle.
[01:23:31.760 -> 01:23:33.600] And then you start feeling and you go,
[01:23:33.600 -> 01:23:36.180] ah, that pain's new.
[01:23:36.180 -> 01:23:38.040] And then as you get to like 40,
[01:23:38.040 -> 01:23:40.780] you're like, that could potentially be death.
[01:23:40.780 -> 01:23:43.700] That pain, I've never felt that before.
[01:23:43.700 -> 01:23:48.240] You guys haven't heard of treatment and massaging and all this other stuff.
[01:23:48.240 -> 01:23:50.480] Like Tom Brady was great in his early 40s.
[01:23:50.480 -> 01:23:51.480] That's another sport.
[01:23:51.480 -> 01:23:54.600] Does anybody know who Tom Brady is that listens to this podcast?
[01:23:54.600 -> 01:23:55.600] American football.
[01:23:55.600 -> 01:23:56.600] American football.
[01:23:56.600 -> 01:23:59.840] Jono, all I'm going to say is there's a difference between going to the doctor at 25, like you
[01:23:59.840 -> 01:24:02.760] are, and when me and Christian go to the doctor.
[01:24:02.760 -> 01:24:04.640] It's very much a managed decline.
[01:24:04.640 -> 01:24:07.200] I just, I want you to prepare for that.
[01:24:07.200 -> 01:24:08.040] But-
[01:24:08.040 -> 01:24:10.360] You have to, you basically have to accept
[01:24:10.360 -> 01:24:14.680] someone entering your body space.
[01:24:14.680 -> 01:24:17.000] Oh, okay, space.
[01:24:17.000 -> 01:24:18.560] The space at the end.
[01:24:18.560 -> 01:24:19.600] Don't forget that boy, yeah.
[01:24:19.600 -> 01:24:21.460] Jono, you've got a lot to look forward to,
[01:24:21.460 -> 01:24:23.660] but you have a sparkling career ahead of you.
[01:24:23.660 -> 01:24:27.600] We'll make sure we include your show notes in the, in the, in the, the, your,
[01:24:27.600 -> 01:24:30.320] your links to your social media, sorry, in the show notes below.
[01:24:30.560 -> 01:24:34.160] And I loved you as a host of the Monaco Grand Prix.
[01:24:34.160 -> 01:24:37.720] I'm going to use you at least one more time this season, because I may have been
[01:24:37.720 -> 01:24:42.520] invited to something and hopefully be far too sozzled to be a competent host, in
[01:24:42.520 -> 01:24:43.760] which case I would want you to step in.
[01:24:48.560 -> 01:24:53.600] All right. Well, I'm, I'm always down for it, Spen. You know I am, and you know I love these podcasts. I just wish we had... You know what? Thanks to the listeners too. The mailbag questions were great,
[01:24:53.600 -> 01:24:56.480] and we had a lot more we could answer too. I wish we had more time.
[01:24:56.480 -> 01:25:02.080] Well, we can just do it again another week soon. Say out loud where we can follow you as well.
[01:25:08.480 -> 01:25:13.200] say out loud where we can follow you as well. Yeah, so at JohnnyS8, J-O-N-N-Y-E-S-S-8. I'm on Twitter, Instagram, best places to follow me. Feel free to message, I'm always happy to respond
[01:25:13.200 -> 01:25:17.600] and just chat F1 in general. And the Slack chat, you've been great too. Love the Slack,
[01:25:17.600 -> 01:25:21.680] they've always been awesome too. So follow me there. Patreon.com forward slash MrApex.
[01:25:22.320 -> 01:25:26.480] Jono, do me a favor, on Twitter, post more of your reporter clips.
[01:25:26.640 -> 01:25:27.800] We like, I'm here.
[01:25:27.800 -> 01:25:33.560] I was watching a baseball game where a kangaroo popped out of a wallaby's nutsack.
[01:25:34.080 -> 01:25:34.480] It was.
[01:25:34.560 -> 01:25:36.320] Well, that's, uh, I'm going to start.
[01:25:36.320 -> 01:25:37.360] I'm going to use that line today.
[01:25:37.360 -> 01:25:38.680] I'm going to go to work in a few hours.
[01:25:38.680 -> 01:25:39.360] I'm going to use that.
[01:25:39.560 -> 01:25:41.160] I want to see those clips on your Twitter.
[01:25:42.320 -> 01:25:51.360] Go and follow Jono and look forward to hearing more from him on Mr Apex podcast and our rogue Viking Christian Bellesen. You briefly, I peer pressured
[01:25:51.360 -> 01:26:00.640] you back onto Twitter and social media, but you have given up. I answered a post I saw and immediately
[01:26:00.640 -> 01:26:05.280] after that I just deleted Twitter because it just turned me into this human I didn't
[01:26:05.280 -> 01:26:06.280] want to be.
[01:26:06.280 -> 01:26:08.080] No, yeah, there is definitely.
[01:26:08.080 -> 01:26:13.000] Well you know it, the Twitter disease, yeah, I'm not sure what's going to happen there,
[01:26:13.000 -> 01:26:14.640] I'm not coming back, that's for sure.
[01:26:14.640 -> 01:26:20.640] But I just wanted to reiterate what Jonathan said, every time there's questions in this
[01:26:20.640 -> 01:26:26.600] podcast, people are just so sincere, people are so into it and it's just a pleasure.
[01:26:26.600 -> 01:26:28.640] Yeah, I wanna reiterate, yeah, what Jono said.
[01:26:28.640 -> 01:26:30.080] Like when we do these mailbag shows,
[01:26:30.080 -> 01:26:32.080] the reason we keep doing them is because
[01:26:32.080 -> 01:26:34.200] you just think of topics and angles
[01:26:34.200 -> 01:26:36.600] that don't necessarily spring to mind.
[01:26:36.600 -> 01:26:37.720] So when there's not a race,
[01:26:37.720 -> 01:26:40.400] when there's not a news drumbeat,
[01:26:40.400 -> 01:26:42.760] you guys just going, hey, this is on my mind,
[01:26:42.760 -> 01:26:45.060] gives us fantastic things to talk about.
[01:26:45.060 -> 01:26:46.580] And please do respond.
[01:26:46.580 -> 01:26:48.340] I meant what I said at the top of the show.
[01:26:48.340 -> 01:26:52.240] Like, don't feel like the emailing me is trivial.
[01:26:52.240 -> 01:26:55.340] I think from, you know, on a podcast to a podcast listener,
[01:26:55.340 -> 01:26:57.020] I really do feel like there is a connection.
[01:26:57.020 -> 01:26:59.780] I feel that for the podcasts that I listen to,
[01:26:59.780 -> 01:27:01.640] and I always email them as well.
[01:27:01.640 -> 01:27:03.300] And I'm always delighted to get a response.
[01:27:03.300 -> 01:27:04.740] So just chat with me.
[01:27:04.740 -> 01:27:11.880] You can email me spanners at MrApex.net. My DMs are always open on Twitter and on Facebook
[01:27:11.880 -> 01:27:17.160] and on Instagram, but I don't really understand Instagram that much. But follow me at SpannersReady,
[01:27:17.160 -> 01:27:23.480] Richard Ready on Facebook, and I think SpannersReady on Instagram and MrApex at MrApexF1. Until
[01:27:23.480 -> 01:27:50.000] we see you next, work hard, be kind and have fun. This was mistake podcast. ♪♪
[01:27:50.000 -> 01:28:00.020] ♪♪
[01:28:00.020 -> 01:28:02.020] Looking for a fun way to win up to 25 times your money this
[01:28:02.020 -> 01:28:04.020] basketball season?
[01:28:04.020 -> 01:28:10.280] Test your skills on PrizePicks, the most exciting way to play daily fantasy sports. Just select two or more players,
[01:28:10.280 -> 01:28:15.080] pick more or less on their projection for a wide variety of stats, and place your entry.
[01:28:15.080 -> 01:28:21.840] It's as easy as that. If you have the skills, you can turn $10 into $250 with just a few
[01:28:21.840 -> 01:28:26.100] taps. Easy gameplay, quick withdrawals, and injury insurance on your picks
[01:28:26.100 -> 01:28:28.280] are what make PrizePicks the number one
[01:28:28.280 -> 01:28:30.000] daily fantasy sports app.
[01:28:30.000 -> 01:28:31.440] Ready to test your skills?
[01:28:31.440 -> 01:28:33.520] Join the PrizePicks community of more than
[01:28:33.520 -> 01:28:36.560] seven million players who have already signed up.
[01:28:36.560 -> 01:28:39.280] Right now, PrizePicks will match your first deposit
[01:28:39.280 -> 01:28:40.920] up to $100.
[01:28:40.920 -> 01:28:44.120] Just visit prizepicks.com slash get100
[01:28:44.120 -> 01:28:45.000] and use code get 100.
[01:28:45.000 -> 01:28:50.000] That's code get 100 at prizepicks.com slash get 100.
[01:28:50.000 -> 01:28:53.000] For a first deposit matchup to $100.
[01:28:53.000 -> 01:28:57.000] Prize Picks, daily fantasy sports made easy.
[01:29:00.000 -> 01:29:05.000] Save big on the brands you love at the Fred Meyer 5 a.m. Black Friday sale!
[01:29:05.000 -> 01:29:09.000] Shop in-store on Black Friday for 50% off socks and underwear.
[01:29:09.000 -> 01:29:12.000] Board games and card games are buy one get one free!
[01:29:12.000 -> 01:29:16.000] Save on great gifts for everyone like TVs and appliances.
[01:29:16.000 -> 01:29:21.000] And the first 100 customers on Black Friday will get free gift cards too!
[01:29:21.000 -> 01:29:24.000] So shop Friday, November 24th and save big!
[01:29:24.000 -> 01:29:25.760] Doors open at 5 a.m. so get
[01:29:25.760 -> 01:29:30.400] there early. Fred Meyer, fresh for everyone.